Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated “binaural” hearing aid

Abstract Objective: To investigate the influence of an algorithm designed to enhance or magnify interaural difference cues on speech signals in noisy, spatially complex conditions using both technical and perceptual measurements. To also investigate the combination of interaural magnification (IM), monaural microphone directionality (DIR), and binaural coherence-based noise reduction (BC). Design: Speech-in-noise stimuli were generated using virtual acoustics. A computational model of binaural hearing was used to analyse the spatial effects of IM. Predicted speech quality changes and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) improvements were also considered. Additionally, a listening test was carried out to assess speech intelligibility and quality. Study sample: Listeners aged 65–79 years with and without sensorineural hearing loss (N = 10 each). Results: IM increased the horizontal separation of concurrent directional sound sources without introducing any major artefacts. In situations with diffuse noise, however, the interaural difference cues were distorted. Preprocessing the binaural input signals with DIR reduced distortion. IM influenced neither speech intelligibility nor speech quality. Conclusions: The IM algorithm tested here failed to improve speech perception in noise, probably because of the dispersion and inconsistent magnification of interaural difference cues in complex environments.

[1]  N I Durlach,et al.  Interaural magnification. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Auditory model based direction estimation of concurrent speakers from binaural signals , 2011, Speech Commun..

[3]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  K S Helfer,et al.  Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Database of Multichannel In-Ear and Behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[8]  Christopher A Brown Binaural Enhancement for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[9]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Speech intelligibility enhancement by interaural magnification. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[10]  M. Moonen,et al.  Distortion of interaural time cues by directional noise reduction systems in modern digital hearing aids , 2005, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2005..

[11]  Giso Grimm,et al.  The master hearing Aid : A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation , 2006 .

[12]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[13]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: Do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role? , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Bernhard U. Seeber,et al.  A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Do Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function Modulate Benefit From Different Binaural Noise-Reduction Settings? , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Tobias Neher,et al.  Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[20]  K. Helfer,et al.  Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L). , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) , 2010 .

[23]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.