Input Encoding Proposal for Behavioral Experiments with a Virtual C. elegans Representation

This paper discusses a Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) nematode behavioral experiment input encoding. It proposes a common digital representation for behavioral studies with C. elegans. This work is a step forward towards the reproducibility and comparability of in silico simulations of the nematode with real-world experiments. The digital representation is divided into environmental and experimental configurations. The behavioral input is structured by duration-based behavioral experiment types at the top level (i.e. interaction at a specific time, interaction from t0 – t1 and overall duration) and by interaction type (i.e. mechanotaxis, chemotaxis, thermotaxis, galvanotaxis and phototaxis) for each duration-based type. The environment configuration is composed of the identification of the worm’s mutation type, worm crowding, initial location, configuration of the assay plate, and obstacle settings. Parameters are defined by an XML schema to ensure the interoperability with other simulation solutions. It is being implemented and tested in the context of the Si elegans project.

[1]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[2]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML - The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[3]  Zhaoyang Feng,et al.  Light-sensitive neurons and channels mediate phototaxis in C. elegans , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Martin McGinnity,et al.  The Si elegans Project - The Challenges and Prospects of Emulating Caenorhabditis elegans , 2014, Living Machines.

[5]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Yukiko Matsuoka,et al.  Software support for SBGN maps: SBGN-ML and LibSBGN , 2012, Bioinform..

[7]  Ulla Ruotsalainen,et al.  Neuroinformatics: the integration of shared databases and tools towards integrative neuroscience. , 2002, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[8]  Edmund J. Crampin,et al.  Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  Worm Phenotype Ontology: Integrating phenotype data within and beyond the C. elegans community , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Aravinthan D. T. Samuel,et al.  Neural Circuits Mediate Electrosensory Behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Andrew P. Davison,et al.  Learning from the Past: Approaches for Reproducibility in Computational Neuroscience , 2013 .

[12]  Michel Dumontier,et al.  Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  Sarala M. Wimalaratne,et al.  The Systems Biology Graphical Notation , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Catherine M Lloyd,et al.  CellML: its future, present and past. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[15]  Norman W. Paton,et al.  SBRML: a markup language for associating systems biology data with models , 2010, Bioinform..

[16]  Hugh D. Spence,et al.  Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  Data Sharing for Computational Neuroscience , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[18]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  Interoperability of Neuroscience Modeling Software: Current Status and Future Directions , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[19]  H. Kitano,et al.  Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  NeuroML: A Language for Describing Data Driven Models of Neurons and Networks with a High Degree of Biological Detail , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..