Membrane interactions with NOM and an adsorbent in a vibratory shear enhanced filtration process (VSEP) system

The effects of torsional membrane vibration and the addition of heated aluminum oxide particles (HAOPs) on the interactions of natural organic matter (NOM) with UF membranes were investigated using a vibratory shear enhanced filtration process (VSEP) laboratory module. Torsional vibration reduced fouling in both dead-end and crossflow modes. Incorporating crossflow into a system with vibration increased NOM removal efficiency. In systems with crossflow, increasing the vibration amplitude decreased fouling up to a point, and provided negligible benefit thereafter. On the other hand, it had a negligible effect on NOM rejection up to the same point, and improved permeate quality thereafter. Although a mass balance suggested that a negligible portion of the NOM remained on the membrane surface at the end of the crossflow tests, foulant aggregates were observed on the membrane both visually and in SEM images. The SEM images indicated that vibration changed the morphology of the foulants from a continuous layer into scattered clumps, and that higher vibration amplitude facilitated this transformation. Deposition of a HAOPs layer on the membrane surface relieved fouling only initially, after which the HAOPs/UF system fouled almost as fast as a bare UF membrane. However, intermittent vibration to re-mix HAOPs particles during the HAOPs/UF operation kept permeate flux relatively high for much longer, thereby significantly improving the performance.

[1]  Chun Xing Li,et al.  Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter , 2001 .

[3]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Treatment of dairy process waters modelled by diluted milk using dynamic nanofiltration with a rotating disk module , 2006 .

[4]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  The promise of membrane technology , 1999 .

[5]  Anastasios I. Zouboulis,et al.  Vibratory shear enhanced processing membrane filtration applied for the removal of natural organic matter from surface waters , 2006 .

[6]  K. Choo,et al.  Removal of natural organic matter using iron oxide-coated membrane systems , 2004 .

[7]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Effect of coagulation pretreatment on membrane filtration performance , 2006 .

[8]  Y. Ok,et al.  Agricultural recycling of the by-product concentrate of livestock wastewater treatment plant processed with VSEP RO and bio-ceramic SBR. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration , 2006 .

[10]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Removal of humic substances with vibratory shear enhanced processing membrane filtration , 1998 .

[11]  Bart Van der Bruggen,et al.  A review of pressure‐driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production , 2003 .

[12]  M. Benjamin,et al.  Iron oxide adsorption and UF to remove NOM and control fouling , 1996 .

[13]  T. Lin,et al.  Effects of humic substance characteristics on UF performance , 2000 .

[14]  J Lee,et al.  Tertiary treatment of biologically treated piggery wastewater using vibratory shear-enhanced RO membrane. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Chi-Wang Li,et al.  Iron oxide–coated media for NOM sorption and particulate filtration , 1997 .

[16]  K. Choo,et al.  Development of an integrated iron oxide adsorption/membrane separation system for water treatment , 2002 .

[17]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Enhancing an adsorption-membrane hybrid system with microground activated carbon , 2004 .

[18]  M. Benjamin,et al.  A serial filtration investigation of membrane fouling by natural organic matter , 2007 .

[19]  M R Wiesner,et al.  Peer reviewed: the promise of membrane technology. , 1999, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Michel Y. Jaffrin,et al.  Treatment of dairy process waters using a vibrating filtration system and NF and RO membranes , 2004 .

[21]  W. Pronk,et al.  Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. , 2007, Water research.

[22]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[23]  Jaeshin Kim,et al.  Effects of adsorbents on membrane fouling by natural organic matter , 2008 .

[24]  A. Zydney,et al.  HUMIC ACID FOULING DURING MICROFILTRATION , 1999 .

[25]  Jutta Nuortila-Jokinen,et al.  Influence of shear on flux in membrane filtration of integrated pulp and paper mill circulation water , 2001 .