Running biomechanics as measured by wearable sensors: effects of speed and surface

Running biomechanics research has traditionally occurred in the laboratory, but with the advent of wearable sensors measurement of running biomechanics may shift outside the laboratory. The purpose was to determine if RunScribe™ wearable sensors could detect differences in kinematic, kinetic and spatiotemporal measures during runs at two speeds and on two different surfaces. Fifteen recreational runners (7 males, 8 females; age = 20.0 ± 3.1 years) participated. While wearing sensors on the heels of their shoes, participants completed four 1600 m runs on both track and grass surfaces. On each surface, the first 1600 m was at a self-selected slow speed followed by the second 1600 m at a self-selected fast pace. The sensors quantified several kinetic, kinematic and spatiotemporal measures. Repeated measures ANOVAs compared the effects of surface and speed. The spatiotemporal measures of stride length, cycle time and contact time were predictably affected by increased running speed and increased surface stiffness, as were the kinematic and kinetic measurements of maximum pronation velocity, maximum pronation excursion, impact g, and braking g (p < 0.050). The RunScribe™ sensors identified expected changes in running biomechanics measures at different speeds and on varying surfaces.

[1]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Mechanics of overground accelerated running vs. running on an accelerated treadmill. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[2]  Jonathan Wheat,et al.  Using a wireless consumer accelerometer to measure tibial acceleration during running: agreement with a skin-mounted sensor , 2018 .

[3]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. , 2015, Journal of physical activity & health.

[4]  Vitor Tessutti,et al.  In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  Chanam Lee,et al.  Assessment of wearable global positioning system units for physical activity research. , 2012, Journal of physical activity & health.

[6]  K. Page,et al.  A gene regulatory motif that generates oscillatory or multiway switch outputs , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  T. Ueda,et al.  The Effects of Running Speed on Ground Reaction Forces and Lower Limb Kinematics During Single-Leg Stop Movement , 2016, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  Tzyy-Yuang Shiang,et al.  Measuring kinematic changes of the foot using a gyro sensor during intense running , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  P. Cavanagh The Biomechanics of Lower Extremity Action in Distance Running , 1987, Foot & ankle.

[10]  T. Lejeune,et al.  Effect of speed on kinematic, kinetic, electromyographic and energetic reference values during treadmill walking , 2008, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Morin,et al.  Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[12]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[13]  I. Sacco,et al.  Attenuation of foot pressure during running on four different surfaces: asphalt, concrete, rubber, and natural grass , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Tim W Dorn,et al.  Effect of running speed on lower limb joint kinetics. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  J. Hertel,et al.  Validation of a Wearable Sensor for Measuring Running Biomechanics , 2018, Digital Biomarkers.

[16]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. , 1989, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  P. Komi,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting running economy. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.