Predicting process windows for pattern density multiplication using block copolymer directed self-assembly in conjunction with chemoepitaxial guiding layers

Pattern density multiplication using directed self-assembly (DSA) of block copolymers (BCPs) is a technique capable of producing patterns with small pitches utilizing guiding template patterns printed as larger feature sizes and pitches. One method for achieving this density multiplication is to utilize chemoepitaxy based on a guiding underlayer that is nominally topographically flat but which is composed of a pinning region, or stripe if referring to lamellae, which will chemically prefer one microphase of the BCP, as well as a second region that is often referred to as “neutral” to both phases of the BCP. In most conceptions of such a chemoepitaxial approach for alignment of lamellae patterns, the pinning stripe is typically the width of a single lamellae of the phase separated BCP, while the neutral stripe is some odd number of lamellae widths. In this work, detailed simulation studies have been performed to elucidate the effects of variables such as guiding stripe size, chemical composition of the neutral stripes, and small topography on the process window of DSA pitch sub-division patterning processes. A simple but novel technique has been developed and utilized to quantify the level of alignment of a simulated BCP film to an underlying guiding pattern. Such process windows and lithographic parameters have been studied for different pitch sub-division conditions including 1:3 and 1:5 pinning stripe:neutral stripe width ratios. It is found that the center of the processing window occurs at a composition of the “neutral stripe” such that it is slightly to somewhat strongly preferential to the type of polymer of opposite type to that attracted by the pinning stripe, and that this ideal “neutral stripe” composition becomes more neutral as the density multiplication increases.

[1]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[2]  Mark Somervell,et al.  Pattern scaling with directed self assembly through lithography and etch process integration , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Simulation study of the effect of differences in block energy and density on the self-assembly of block copolymers , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Christophe Navarro,et al.  Pattern density multiplication by direct self assembly of block copolymers: toward 300mm CMOS requirements , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Effect of guiding layer topography on chemoepitaxially directed self-assembly of block copolymers for pattern density multiplication , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Juan J. de Pablo,et al.  Chemical Patterns for Directed Self-Assembly of Lamellae-Forming Block Copolymers with Density Multiplication of Features , 2013 .

[7]  Kris T. Delaney,et al.  Self-consistent field theory of directed self-assembly in laterally confined lamellae-forming diblock copolymers , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  William D. Hinsberg,et al.  Self-assembly patterning for sub-15nm half-pitch: a transition from lab to fab , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Joshua A. Anderson,et al.  General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Simulations of theoretically informed coarse grain models of polymeric systems. , 2010, Faraday discussions.

[11]  Hengpeng Wu,et al.  All track directed self-assembly of block copolymers: process flow and origin of defects , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Ofir Montal,et al.  Directed self-assembly defectivity assessment. Part II , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Tuning domain size of block copolymers for directed self assembly using polymer blending: molecular dynamics simulation studies , 2013 .

[14]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Theoretically informed coarse grain simulations of polymeric systems. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  Juan J. de Pablo,et al.  Interpolation in the Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers on Nanopatterned Substrates: Simulation and Experiments , 2010 .

[16]  Glenn H. Fredrickson,et al.  Directed self-assembly of laterally confined lamellae-forming diblock copolymers: polydispersity and substrate interaction effects , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  G. Fredrickson,et al.  Microdomain Ordering in Laterally Confined Block Copolymer Thin Films , 2007 .

[18]  E. Kramer,et al.  SCFT Simulations of Thin Film Blends of Block Copolymer and Homopolymer Laterally Confined in a Square Well , 2009 .

[19]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Coarse grained molecular dynamics model of block copolymer directed self-assembly , 2013 .

[20]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Detailed molecular dynamics studies of block copolymer directed self-assembly: Effect of guiding layer properties , 2013 .