Economic and Energy Life Cycle Assessment of aerogel-based thermal renders

Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide the Economic Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of several aerogel-based cementitious thermal insulating rendering mortars, produced in laboratory. This assessment is extremely important because it highlights the need for greater control and a better assessment of the costs of sustainable solutions in construction, namely for energy renovation of the building envelope. Twenty-five laboratory thermal aerogel-based renders were analysed and the following was concluded: the renders with commercial aerogel are the least expensive; the introduction of another lightweight aggregate allows for a reduction of the cost; renders with a subcritical hydrophobic aerogel produced in laboratorial scale are the most expensive but can be optimized in an industrial process. Through the LCA methodology it is possible to ascertain the costs incurred, not only during the production of the mortar but also throughout its whole service life, from cradle to cradle (C2C), including the stages corresponding to its application on the building, maintenance and end-of-life. In addition to the economic evaluation, an energy study was also carried out to highlight the benefits of using these renders in the improvement of the envelope’s insulation, namely the decrease of heating and cooling needs and the corresponding costs over the service life. The wall alternatives that were energy retrofitted with a thermal mortar only provide “economic savings” if a consumption of energy fulfilling more than 10% of the heating and cooling needs is considered. Moreover, the best solution for initial investment was not the one preferred in terms of life cycle economic and energy costs. To sum up, the use of an economic LCA methodology is advantageous in improving the sustainability of the construction, since it facilitates the task of identifying possible improvements based on the study phases and thus the reduction of costs during the life cycle.

[1]  J. Brito,et al.  Silica-based aerogels as aggregates for cement-based thermal renders , 2016 .

[2]  Inês Flores-Colen,et al.  The influence of moisture content on the thermal conductivity of external thermal mortars , 2017 .

[3]  A. M. Rosa,et al.  Hybrid Silica/Polymer Aerogels Dried at Ambient Pressure , 2007 .

[4]  B. P. Jelle,et al.  Effect of storage and curing conditions at elevated temperatures on aerogel-incorporated mortar samples based on UHPC recipe , 2016 .

[5]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  From the new European Standards to an environmental, energy and economic assessment of building assemblies from cradle-to-cradle (3E-C2C) , 2013 .

[6]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art aerogel applications in buildings , 2013 .

[7]  Janusz Adamczyk,et al.  The comparison of thermal insulation types of plaster with cement plaster , 2014 .

[8]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[9]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[10]  L. Zhaohui,et al.  Thermal insulation material based on SiO2 aerogel , 2016 .

[11]  Silvia Barbero,et al.  Analysis on existent thermal insulating plasters towards innovative applications: Evaluation methodology for a real cost-performance comparison , 2014 .

[12]  Inês Flores-Colen,et al.  A systematic approach for maintenance budgeting of buildings façades based on predictive and preventive strategies , 2010 .

[13]  Pascal Henry Biwole,et al.  Building envelope with a new aerogel-based insulating rendering: Experimental and numerical study, cost analysis, and thickness optimization , 2015 .

[14]  Cinzia Buratti,et al.  Development of Innovative Aerogel Based Plasters: Preliminary Thermal and Acoustic Performance Evaluation , 2014 .

[15]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Life-cycle impact ‘cradle to cradle’ of building assemblies , 2014 .

[16]  B. P. Jelle,et al.  Calcined clays as binder for thermal insulating and structural aerogel incorporated mortar , 2016 .

[17]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Toward aerogel based thermal superinsulation in buildings: A comprehensive review , 2014 .

[18]  L. Ilharco,et al.  Superhydrophobic hybrid aerogel powders from waterglass with distinctive applications , 2014 .

[19]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition—A case study , 2011 .

[20]  Samuel Brunner,et al.  Thermo-hygric properties of a newly developed aerogel based insulation rendering for both exterior and interior applications , 2012 .

[21]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Environmental impacts and benefits of the end-of-life of building materials – calculation rules, results and contribution to a “cradle to cradle” life cycle , 2014 .

[22]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods , 2012 .

[23]  Iva Kovacic,et al.  Tool for life cycle analysis of facade-systems for industrial buildings , 2016 .

[24]  G. Carlson,et al.  Aerogel commercialization: technology, markets and costs , 1995 .

[25]  Inês Flores-Colen,et al.  Aerogel-based renders with lightweight aggregates: Correlation between molecular/pore structure and performance , 2016 .