Data-driven and calibration-free lamb wave source localization with sparse sensor arrays

Most Lamb wave localization techniques require that we know the wave's velocity characteristics; yet, in many practical scenarios, velocity estimates can be challenging to acquire, are unavailable, or are unreliable because of the complexity of Lamb waves. As a result, there is a significant need for new methods that can reduce a system's reliance on a priori velocity information. This paper addresses this challenge through two novel source localization methods designed for sparse sensor arrays in isotropic media. Both methods exploit the fundamental sparse structure of a Lamb wave's frequencywavenumber representation. The first method uses sparse recovery techniques to extract velocities from calibration data. The second method uses kurtosis and the support earth mover's distance to measure the sparseness of a Lamb wave's approximate frequency-wavenumber representation. These measures are then used to locate acoustic sources with no prior calibration data. We experimentally study each method with a collection of acoustic emission data measured from a 1.22 m by 1.22 m isotropic aluminum plate. We show that both methods can achieve less than 1 cm localization error and have less systematic error than traditional time-of-arrival localization methods.

[1]  Franco Oberti,et al.  A new sharpness metric based on local kurtosis, edge and energy information , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[2]  Stan E Dosso,et al.  Maximum-likelihood and other processors for incoherent and coherent matched-field localization. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Data-driven matched field processing for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Lower bounds of localization uncertainty in sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Weaver,et al.  Temperature dependence of diffuse field phase , 1999, Ultrasonics.

[6]  P. Vielva,et al.  Detection of Non-Gaussianity in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe First-Year Data Using Spherical Wavelets , 2004 .

[7]  F. L. D. Scalea,et al.  Macro-fiber composite piezoelectric rosettes for acoustic source location in complex structures , 2007 .

[8]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  The Constrained Earth Mover Distance Model, with Applications to Compressive Sensing , 2013 .

[11]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Sparse recovery of the multimodal and dispersive characteristics of Lamb waves. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure , 2003 .

[13]  Luca De Marchi,et al.  Acoustic emission localization in plates with dispersion and reverberations using sparse PZT sensors in passive mode , 2012 .

[14]  Salvatore Salamone,et al.  High-velocity Impact Location on Aircraft Panels Using Macro-fiber Composite Piezoelectric Rosettes , 2010 .

[15]  Haibin Ling,et al.  An Efficient Earth Mover's Distance Algorithm for Robust Histogram Comparison , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Compressive Matched-Field Processing , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Matched field processing: source localization in correlated noise as an optimum parameter estimation problem , 1988 .

[18]  LingHaibin,et al.  An Efficient Earth Mover's Distance Algorithm for Robust Histogram Comparison , 2007 .

[19]  T. Kundu,et al.  Point of impact prediction in isotropic and anisotropic plates from the acoustic emission data. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J.E. Michaels,et al.  Detection of structural damage from the local temporal coherence of diffuse ultrasonic signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  T. Kundu,et al.  Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates. , 2012, Ultrasonics.

[22]  Zoi-Heleni Michalopoulou,et al.  Robust multi-tonal matched-field inversion: A coherent approach , 1998 .

[23]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Detection of the point of impact on a stiffened plate by the acoustic emission technique , 2009 .

[24]  Ross M. Levine,et al.  Model-based imaging of damage with Lamb waves via sparse reconstruction. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Nicolò Speciale,et al.  A passive monitoring technique based on dispersion compensation to locate impacts in plate-like structures , 2011 .

[26]  J. Michaels Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors , 2008 .

[27]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[28]  J. B. Harley,et al.  Scale transform signal processing for optimal ultrasonic temperature compensation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  J. Antoni The spectral kurtosis: a useful tool for characterising non-stationary signals , 2006 .

[30]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Toward Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring: Application of Machine Learning and Signal Processing to Damage Detection , 2013, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[31]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Cosmological Non-Gaussian Signature Detection: Comparing Performance of Different Statistical Tests , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[32]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Data-Driven, Sparsity-Based Matched Field Processing for Structural Health Monitoring , 2014 .

[33]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  Acoustic emission source localization and velocity determination of the fundamental mode A0 using wavelet analysis and a Newton-based optimization technique , 2010 .

[34]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures – Active and passive approach , 2009 .

[35]  Mario Bergés,et al.  Robust ultrasonic damage detection under complex environmental conditions using singular value decomposition. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[36]  M.J.S. Lowe,et al.  Matrix techniques for modeling ultrasonic waves in multilayered media , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  Joel B Harley,et al.  Dispersion curve recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of damage location in guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  Claire Debever,et al.  Robust matched-field processing using a coherent broadband white noise constraint processor. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.