Computational fluid–structure interaction analysis of blood flow on patient-specific reconstructed aortic anatomy and aneurysm treatment with Dacron graft

Abstract We use the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) capability in Abaqus to evaluate radial displacements, von Mises stresses and wall shear stresses (WSS) on the human aorta in response to the blood flowing through it. Complications arise when aneurysm is detected and causes the wall to thinner so much that rupture may result. We use the Materialise suite, a specialty software to reconstruct a three-dimensional geometry of the aorta from two-dimensional computerized axial tomography (CAT) images. Results are compared to those obtained on a healthy individual. Blood is assumed to be a Newtonian and incompressible medium and the blood flow is taken as pulsatile, fully developed and turbulent. The model used for aorta is Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden (HGO), a sophisticated hyperelastic model that can describe biological tissues. We also study the behavior of Dacron, a polyester fabric used as graft in aortic surgical repair. Here, Dacron is represented by a neo-Hookean (isotropic) hyperelastic model. Time-dependent pressure conditions are assumed at the inlet and outlet of the resulting structure. Results indicate that using a patient-specific geometry for the aorta yields additional insight on the state of the stresses applied on the aortic walls. In addition, stress contours on the Dacron are comparable to those obtained on a healthy patient and stresses evaluated at the interface of the biological tissues and the fabric, provide useful information regarding the suture strength needed during surgery. In the case of aneurysm, our simulation results agree well with experimental data taken from the literature particularly with regard to WSS which can be used to assess the seriousness of the aneurysm condition. If an idealized cylindrical shell is used in place of the reconstructed anatomy, the von Mises stress values do not differ much but it underestimates the values of WSS which could interpreted as the presence of an aneurysm when there is not. Among the novel contributions, the present FSI model has the ability to predict the Dacron’s response to realistic hemodynamic loading conditions.

[1]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[2]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta , 2014 .

[3]  M. Païdoussis,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of shells conveying pulsatile flow with pulse-wave propagation. Theory and numerical results for a single harmonic pulsation , 2017 .

[4]  Pascal Verdonck,et al.  Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm – FSI modelling , 2009 .

[5]  M. Cnotliwy,et al.  Haemostatic factors and intraluminal thrombus thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Is secondary fibrinolysis relevant? , 2013, Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society.

[6]  L. Blomqvist,et al.  Imaging the intraluminal thrombus of abdominal aortic aneurysms: techniques, findings, and clinical implications. , 2011, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Effect of Variation in Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Properties on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  A. Huerta,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems , 2003 .

[9]  D. Ku,et al.  Optimal graft diameter: effect of wall shear stress on vascular healing. , 1989, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  Viscoelastic characterization of woven Dacron for aortic grafts by using direction-dependent quasi-linear viscoelasticity. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[11]  A. J. Geers,et al.  Patient-specific modelling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The influence of wall thickness on predicted clinical outcomes. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  K. Affeld,et al.  Estimation of wall shear stress in bypass grafts with computational fluid dynamics method , 2001, The International journal of artificial organs.

[13]  Peter Regitnig,et al.  Layer-specific damage experiments and modeling of human thoracic and abdominal aortas with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[14]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  Computational vascular fluid–structure interaction: methodology and application to cerebral aneurysms , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[15]  P. Blondeaux,et al.  Intermittent turbulence in a pulsating pipe flow , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  P Croisille,et al.  Fluid- and Biomechanical Analysis of Ascending Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm with Concomitant Aortic Insufficiency , 2017, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  R. Mongrain,et al.  A three‐layer model for buckling of a human aortic segment under specific flow‐pressure conditions , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[18]  Gerhard Sommer,et al.  Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[19]  Alastair J. Martin,et al.  Aneurysm Growth Occurs at Region of Low Wall Shear Stress: Patient-Specific Correlation of Hemodynamics and Growth in a Longitudinal Study , 2008, Stroke.

[20]  Raad H. Mohiaddin,et al.  Fluid-Solid Interaction Simulation of Flow and Stress Pattern in Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms: A Patient Specific Study , 2006 .

[21]  G. Moneta,et al.  Intraluminal thrombus is associated with early rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  M. Païdoussis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Dacron Aortic Prostheses Conveying Pulsatile Flow. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  Ambroise Duprey,et al.  Predictive Models with Patient Specific Material Properties for the Biomechanical Behavior of Ascending Thoracic Aneurysms , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Elefteriades,et al.  Natural history of Type B aortic dissection: ten tips. , 2014, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[25]  Mahsa Dabagh,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of Pulsatile Blood Flow in Idealized Model of Human Aortic Arch: Study of Hypotension and Hypertension , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[26]  D Kaiser,et al.  Lack of hemodynamic forces triggers apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  Richard J. Lozowy,et al.  Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[29]  M. Païdoussis,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction for nonlinear response of shells conveying pulsatile flow , 2016 .

[30]  G. Holzapfel Determination of material models for arterial walls from uniaxial extension tests and histological structure. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[32]  Stavroula Balabani,et al.  Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models , 2015, Biomedical engineering online.

[33]  Ihor Huk,et al.  The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Intraluminal Thrombus: Current Concepts of Development and Treatment , 2015, Front. Cardiovasc. Med..

[34]  R. Budwig,et al.  Model studies of the flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms during resting and exercise conditions. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Alexander D. Shkolnik,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[36]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[37]  R. Jayendiran,et al.  Dacron graft as replacement to dissected aorta: A three-dimensional fluid-structure-interaction analysis. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[38]  J. Womersley Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Role of 0D peripheral vasculature model in fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysms , 2010 .

[40]  D. Celentano,et al.  Mechanical characterisation of Dacron graft: Experiments and numerical simulation. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  Patrick Segers,et al.  Impact of competitive flow on wall shear stress in coronary surgery: computational fluid dynamics of a LIMA-LAD model. , 2010, Cardiovascular research.

[42]  S. Pasta,et al.  Regional variation of wall shear stress in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms , 2014, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[43]  M. Epstein,et al.  Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs , 2002 .

[44]  C. Nair,et al.  Clinical, diagnostic, and management perspectives of aortic dissection. , 2002, Chest.