Uncertainty in msPAF-Based Ecotoxicological Effect Factors for Freshwater Ecosystems in Life Cycle Impact Assessment

Abstract Ecotoxicological effect factors are part of the analysis of relative impacts by chemical contaminants on ecosystems. Uncertainty distributions, represented by the 90% confidence interval, belonging to ecotoxicological effect factors for freshwater ecosystems were determined. This study includes 869 high production volume chemicals, related to 7 nonspecific toxic modes of action (TMoAs). The ecotoxicological effect factors are divided into a TMoA-specific part and a chemical-specific part. The 90% confidence interval of the TMoA-specific part of the effect factor ranges from 23 orders of magnitude for acrylate toxicity to 2 orders of magnitude for nonpolar narcosis. The range in the TMoA-specific part of the effect factor is mainly caused by uncertainty in the spread in toxic sensitivity between species (σj). Average uncertainty in the chemical-specific part of the effect factors depends on the number of species tested and ranges on average from a factor of 5 for more than 3 species tested to a factor of about 1,000 for 2 species tested. Average uncertainty in the ecotoxicological effect factors ranges from a factor of 100 for more than 3 species tested to a factor of nearly 10,000 for 2 species tested. It is recommended that the ecotoxicological effect factor of a chemical is based on toxicity data of at least 4 species.

[1]  C. V. Van Leeuwen,et al.  The application of QSARs, extrapolation and equilibrium partitioning in aquatic effects assessment for narcotic pollutants. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Human population intake fractions and environmental fate factors of toxic pollutants in life cycle impact assessment. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[3]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Ecotoxicological Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment , 2001 .

[4]  T. Jager,et al.  Prediction of ecological no‐effect concentrations for initial risk assessment: Combining substance‐specific data and database information , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  P. Allen,et al.  Lognormal Distributions , 1945, Nature.

[6]  T Aldenberg,et al.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. , 2000, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[7]  Marjan Ravbar.  SPATIAL PLANNING - WHAT FOR? , 2007 .

[8]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[9]  Olivier Klepper,et al.  Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regions , 1998 .

[10]  John D. Walker,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Predicted effects of toxicant mixtures are confirmed by changes in fish species assemblages in Ohio, USA, rivers , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  Wout Slob,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models , 1994 .

[13]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[14]  D. Zwart.  Observed Regularities in Species Sensitivity Distributions for Aquatic Species , 2001 .

[15]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: Proposed methodologies , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[16]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Bringing science and pragmatism together a tiered approach for modelling toxicological impacts in LCA , 2004 .

[17]  J. Gaddum,et al.  Lognormal Distributions , 1945, Nature.

[18]  J. Payet.  Assessing toxic impacts on aquatic ecosystems in life cycle assessment (LCA) , 2004 .

[19]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment , 2004 .

[20]  J. Hermens,et al.  Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species in relation to the classification of environmental pollutants. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[21]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions Revisited: A Critical Appraisal , 2002 .

[22]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Prediction of ecological no-effect concentrations for initial risk assessment: combining substance-specific data and database information. , 2003 .

[23]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Estimating the impact of high-production-volume chemicals on remote ecosystems by toxic pressure calculation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Michael Hauschild,et al.  Aquatic ecotoxicological indicators in life-cycle assessment. , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[25]  W. H. Könemann,et al.  Confusion of concepts in mixture toxicology. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[26]  B. Hansen,et al.  Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method , 1999 .

[28]  Connie Wagner,et al.  Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data , 1991 .

[29]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Calculating life‐cycle assessment effect factors from potentially affected fraction‐based ecotoxicological response functions , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[30]  Mark Crane,et al.  What level of effect is a no observed effect? , 2000 .

[31]  D van de Meent,et al.  Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part II: assessing parameter uncertainty and human variability in the calculation of toxicity potentials. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[32]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .