Dissociating Distractor-Filtering at Encoding and During Maintenance

The effectiveness of distractor-filtering is a potentially important determinant of working memory capacity (WMC). However, a distinction between the contributions of distractor-filtering at WM encoding as opposed to filtering during maintenance has not been made and the assumption is that these rely on the same mechanism. Within 2 experiments, 1 conducted in the laboratory with 21 participants, and the other played as a game on smartphones (n = 3,247) we measure WMC without distractors, and present distractors during encoding or during the delay period of a WM task to determine performance associated with distraction at encoding and during maintenance. Despite differences in experimental setting and paradigm design between the 2 studies, we show a unique contribution to WMC from both encoding and delay distractor performance in both experiments, while controlling for performance in the absence of distraction. Thus, within 2 separate experiments, 1 involving an extremely large cohort of 3,247 participants, we show a dissociation between encoding and delay distractor-filtering, indicating that separate mechanisms may contribute to WMC.

[1]  Yuanye Ma,et al.  Distracters impair and create working memory-related neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  T. Robbins,et al.  Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[3]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia locks the gate to working memory , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD , 2002 .

[6]  D. Linden,et al.  Improving visual short-term memory by sequencing the stimulus array , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  M. Osaka,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: Possible contribution of top–down inhibitory control , 2010, Brain Research.

[8]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Impulsive Personality Predicts Dopamine-Dependent Changes in Frontostriatal Activity during Component Processes of Working Memory , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Paul M. Grasby,et al.  Systemic sulpiride modulates striatal blood flow: relationships to spatial working memory and planning , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[12]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Working-memory capacity explains reasoning abilityand a little bit more , 2002 .

[13]  Philip A. Kragel,et al.  Regional brain differences in the effect of distraction during the delay interval of a working memory task , 2007, Brain Research.

[14]  Lars Bäckman,et al.  Transfer of Learning After Updating Training Mediated by the Striatum , 2008, Science.

[15]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  M D'Esposito,et al.  Enhanced frontal function in Parkinson's disease. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  R. Passingham,et al.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Robbins,et al.  Systemic sulpiride in young adult volunteers simulates the profile of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[23]  O. Jensen,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Serve to Protect Working Memory Maintenance against Anticipated Distracters , 2012, Current Biology.

[24]  Y. Tong,et al.  The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[26]  G. Geffen,et al.  Working memory correlates of three symptom clusters in schizophrenia , 2002, Psychiatry Research.

[27]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  P. Goldman-Rakic Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. , 1994, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[29]  Deanna M. Barch,et al.  A broken filter: Prefrontal functional connectivity abnormalities in schizophrenia during working memory interference , 2012, Schizophrenia Research.

[30]  D. Vaitl,et al.  Functional correlates of distractor suppression during spatial working memory encoding , 2010, Neuroscience.

[31]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Changes in Cortical Dopamine D1 Receptor Binding Associated with Cognitive Training , 2009, NeuroImage.