Topology Optimization Design and Experimental Research of a 3D-Printed Metal Aerospace Bracket Considering Fatigue Performance

In the aerospace industry, spacecraft often serve in harsh operating environments, so the design of ultra-lightweight and high-performance structures is a major requirement in aerospace structure design. In this article, a lightweight aerospace bracket considering fatigue performance was designed by topology optimization and manufactured by 3D-printing. Considering the requirements of assembly with a fixture for fatigue testing and avoiding stress concentration, a reconstructed model was presented by CAD software before manufacturing. To improve the fatigue performance of the structure, this article proposes the design idea of abstracting the practiced working condition of the bracket subjected to cycle loads in the vertical direction via a multiple load-case topology optimization problem by minimizing compliance under a variety of asymmetric extreme loading conditions. Parameter sweeping was used to improve the computational efficiency. The mass of the new bracket was reduced by 37% compared to the original structure. Both numerical simulation and the fatigue test were implemented to support the validity of the new bracket. This work indicates that the integration of the proposed topology optimization design method and additive manufacturing can be a powerful tool for the design of lightweight structures considering fatigue performance.

[1]  Xiaodong Huang,et al.  Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures considering fatigue failure , 2019, Materials & Design.

[2]  N. Olhoff,et al.  Topological Design for Minimum Dynamic Compliance of Structures under Forced Vibration , 2014 .

[3]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis: Overview and review , 1994 .

[4]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization , 2014 .

[5]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization approaches , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[6]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  Topology optimization of continuum structures: A review* , 2001 .

[7]  S. Beretta,et al.  A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes , 2017 .

[8]  Rodrigue Desmorat,et al.  Topology optimization in damage governed low cycle fatigue , 2008 .

[9]  M. Ramulu,et al.  Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V , 2014 .

[10]  Jihong Zhu,et al.  From Topology Optimization Design to Additive Manufacturing: Today’s Success and Tomorrow’s Roadmap , 2020, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[11]  Matteo Bruggi,et al.  Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and simplified nominal stress constraints for fatigue resistance , 2017 .

[12]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Fatigue-based topology optimization with non-proportional loads , 2019 .

[13]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization , 2009 .

[14]  K. Svanberg.  The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[15]  Tong Gao,et al.  An aerospace bracket designed by thermo-elastic topology optimization and manufactured by additive manufacturing , 2020 .

[16]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Fatigue constrained topology optimization , 2014 .

[17]  T. Dbouk,et al.  A review about the engineering design of optimal heat transfer systems using topology optimization , 2017 .

[18]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Sensitivity filtering from a continuum mechanics perspective , 2012 .