Characterizing water surface elevation under different flow conditions for the upcoming SWOT mission

Abstract The Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite mission (SWOT), scheduled for launch in 2021, will deliver two-dimensional observations of water surface heights for lakes, rivers wider than 100 m and oceans. Even though the scientific literature has highlighted several fields of application for the expected products, detailed simulations of the SWOT radar performance for a realistic river scenario have not been presented in the literature. Understanding the error of the most fundamental “raw” SWOT hydrology product is important in order to have a greater awareness about strengths and limits of the forthcoming satellite observations. This study focuses on a reach (∼140 km in length) of the middle-lower portion of the Po River, in Northern Italy, and, to date, represents one of the few real-case analyses of the spatial patterns in water surface elevation accuracy expected from SWOT. The river stretch is characterized by a main channel varying from 100 to 500 m in width and a large floodplain (up to 5 km) delimited by a system of major embankments. The simulation of the water surface along the Po River for different flow conditions (high, low and mean annual flows) is performed with inputs from a quasi-2D model implemented using detailed topographic and bathymetric information (LiDAR, 2 m resolution). By employing a simulator that mimics many SWOT satellite sensor characteristics and generates proxies of the remotely sensed hydrometric data, this study characterizes the spatial observations potentially provided by SWOT. We evaluate SWOT performance under different hydraulic conditions and assess possible effects of river embankments, river width, river topography and distance from the satellite ground track. Despite analyzing errors from the raw radar pixel cloud, which receives minimal processing, the present study highlights the promising potential of this Ka-band interferometer for measuring water surface elevations, with mean elevation errors of 0.1 cm and 21 cm for high and low flows, respectively. Results of the study characterize the expected performance of the upcoming SWOT mission and provide additional insights into potential applications of SWOT observations.

[1]  Guy Schumann,et al.  Exploiting the proliferation of current and future satellite observations of rivers , 2016 .

[2]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  A Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance , 2006 .

[3]  Tommaso Moramarco,et al.  Investigating the uncertainty of satellite altimetry products for hydrodynamic modelling , 2015 .

[4]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite‐derived North American River Width data set , 2015 .

[5]  Francesca Carisi,et al.  Evolution of flood risk over large areas: Quantitative assessment for the Po river , 2015 .

[6]  Alain Mallet,et al.  KaRIn on SWOT: Characteristics of Near-Nadir Ka-Band Interferometric SAR Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath‐altimetry into a raster‐based hydrodynamics model , 2007 .

[8]  Chris Sneddon,et al.  Water, Geopolitics, and Economic Development in the Conceptualization of a Region , 2012 .

[9]  J. Danielson,et al.  International River Basins of the World , 1999 .

[10]  Michael Durand,et al.  The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission: Observing Terrestrial Surface Water and Oceanic Submesoscale Eddies , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  K. Ouchi Radar imaging of roughness pattern on the ocean surface , 1986 .

[12]  Colin J. Gleason,et al.  Crossing the (watershed) divide: satellite data and the changing politics of international river basins , 2017 .

[13]  Peter Bauer-Gottwein,et al.  Assimilation of radar altimetry to a routing model of the Brahmaputra River , 2013 .

[14]  Development in Remote Sensing Techniques for Hydrological Studies , 2016 .

[15]  Michael Durand,et al.  Assessing the potential global extent of SWOT river discharge observations , 2014 .

[16]  Abdollah A. Jarihani,et al.  Where does all the water go? Partitioning water transmission losses in a data-sparse, multi-channel and low-gradient dryland river system using modelling and remote sensing , 2015 .

[17]  Augusto Getirana,et al.  Integrating spatial altimetry data into the automatic calibration of hydrological models , 2010 .

[18]  Attilio Castellarin,et al.  Regional prediction of flow-duration curves using a three-dimensional kriging , 2014 .

[19]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Downscaling coarse grid hydrodynamic model simulations over large domains , 2014 .

[20]  Alessio Domeneghetti,et al.  Identifying robust large-scale flood risk mitigation strategies: A quasi-2D hydraulic model as a tool for the Po river , 2011 .

[21]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Spatiotemporal densification of river water level time series by multimission satellite altimetry , 2016 .

[22]  Luca Brocca,et al.  River Discharge Estimation by Using Altimetry Data and Simplified Flood Routing Modeling , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Michael Durand,et al.  Swath-altimetry measurements of the main stem Amazon River: measurement errors and hydraulic implications , 2014 .

[24]  James S. Famiglietti,et al.  How well will the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission observe global reservoirs? , 2014 .

[25]  Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,et al.  Streamflow rating uncertainty: Characterisation and impacts on model calibration and performance , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Kerrie M. Tomkins,et al.  Uncertainty in streamflow rating curves: methods, controls and consequences , 2014 .

[27]  A. Brath,et al.  Floodplain management strategies for flood attenuation in the river Po , 2011 .

[28]  Attilio Castellarin,et al.  Geostatistical prediction of flow–duration curves in an index-flow framework , 2014 .

[29]  Delwyn Moller,et al.  Estimation of bathymetric depth and slope from data assimilation of swath altimetry into a hydrodynamic model , 2008 .

[30]  Michael Durand,et al.  Preliminary Characterization of SWOT Hydrology Error Budget and Global Capabilities , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[31]  G. Schumann,et al.  Automated River Reach Definition Strategies: Applications for the Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission , 2017 .

[32]  A. Brath,et al.  Assessing rating-curve uncertainty and its effects on hydraulic model calibration , 2011 .

[33]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  Microwave Radar and Radiometric Remote Sensing , 2013 .

[34]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Measuring surface water from space , 2004 .

[35]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Benchmarking wide swath altimetry‐based river discharge estimation algorithms for the Ganges river system , 2016 .

[36]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[37]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope , 2016 .

[38]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Handbook of radar scattering statistics for terrain , 1989 .

[39]  A. Domeneghetti On the use of SRTM and altimetry data for flood modeling in data‐sparse regions , 2016 .

[40]  L. Smith Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage, and discharge: a review , 1997 .

[41]  Luca Brocca,et al.  The use of remote sensing-derived water surface data for hydraulic model calibration , 2014 .

[42]  Chris Kilsby,et al.  Using satellite altimetry data to augment flow estimation techniques on the Mekong River , 2010 .

[43]  Guy Schumann,et al.  Estimating the impact of satellite observations on the predictability of large-scale hydraulic models , 2014 .