Differential developments of Taiwanese schools in organizational learning: exploration of critical factors

Against the backgrounds of twin forces (grass‐root and government) that have governed the reform movement in Taiwan since 1995, the present paper attempts to assess school development along the path towards learning organizations. Guiding the present assessment is a newly conceived model, which resorts to organizational learning processes and outcomes to construct a two‐by‐two typology, and four possible stages of development were postulated. From the distribution of a sample of 88 elementary and secondary Taiwanese schools, a bipolar concentration of schools in the relatively unchanged conditions and advanced stages of organizational learning were found. This suggested a sharp contrast between schools that prefer status quo versus those that actively search for new directions in meeting the rising challenges. Further exploration of factors that promote organizational changes revealed that external, intra‐organizational and, to a smaller extent, the contextual factors all play some part in organizational learning. Additional interviews with principals of schools located in differential stages of development clarify how their perception and mentality shape their schools’ development.

[1]  Tim Simkins,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness and the local management of schools , 1994 .

[2]  Hallie Preskill,et al.  Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations , 1998 .

[3]  Phillip C. Schlechty Schools for the 21st Century , 1990 .

[4]  Theo Bastiaens,et al.  Results: How to assess performance, learning, and perceptions in organizations, by Richard A. Swanson and Elwood F. Holton III , 2000 .

[5]  Joseph Claudet An Interpretive Analysis of Educator Change Processes in Response to a Program Innovation: Implications for Personnel Evaluation , 1999 .

[6]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Conditions Fostering Organizational Learning in Schools , 1998 .

[7]  Individuals who learn create organizations that learn , 1996 .

[8]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Learning Preferences and Cognitive Style , 2000 .

[9]  Y. Lam,et al.  Toward reconceptualizing organizational learning: a multidimensional interpretation , 2001 .

[10]  Louise Stoll,et al.  Realising Our Potential: Understanding and Developing Capacity for Lasting Improvement , 1999 .

[11]  Heather A. Haveman Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[12]  R. Snell Moral Foundations of the Learning Organization , 2001 .

[13]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  A Response to Snell the Learning Organization: Fact or Fiction? , 2001 .

[14]  Michael X Cohen Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections , 1991 .

[15]  Cecil G. Miskel,et al.  Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice , 1978 .

[16]  In search of basic sources that propel organizational learning under recent Taiwanese school reforms , 2002 .

[17]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[18]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .