The Persuasive Automobile: Design and Evaluation of a Persuasive Lane-Specific Advice Human Machine Interface

Traffic congestion is a major societal challenge. By advising drivers on the optimal lane to drive, traffic flow can be improved, and congestion reduced. In this paper we describe the development of a lane-specific advice Human Machine Interface (HMI). Persuading drivers to follow an advice that is beneficial to the traffic situation, but may not be immediately beneficial to the drivers themselves, is challenging. In this paper we define persuasive elements to encourage drivers to follow the lane-specific advices. We then describe the interface design process, followed by its evaluation using a driving simulator study. In the simulator study, the effect of two types of persuasion are evaluated: a competitive variant where drivers could earn points and compete with others, and a cooperative variant where real-time information on the number of compliant drivers was available. Participants drove in the simulator on two days. Between days, the treatment groups viewed a Web-portal showing their performance and encouragement from an avatar. Those in the competitive and cooperative groups followed significantly more advices (117 and 111) than those in the control group (89). No significant differences were visible between competitive and cooperative groups. The differences between groups only emerged on the second day.

[1]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Can You Be Persuaded? Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2009, INTERACT.

[2]  D A Owens,et al.  The Mandelbaum effect: evidence for an accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  Paul van Gent,et al.  A conceptual model for persuasive in-vehicle technology to influence tactical level driver behaviour , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[4]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Trusting Automation Technology for Safer Roads: The Effect of Shared Driving Goals , 2012 .

[5]  Dick de Waard,et al.  The measurement of drivers' mental workload , 1996 .

[6]  R. Cialdini Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[7]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  M. Harjumaa,et al.  A Systematic Framework for Designing and Evaluating Persuasive Systems , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[9]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Show Me or Tell Me: Designing Avatars for Feedback , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Single Frequency Precise Point Positioning: Obtaining a map accurate to lane-level , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[11]  J. DiMicco,et al.  When the experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the users , 2008 .

[12]  Peter A Hancock,et al.  State of science: mental workload in ergonomics , 2015, Ergonomics.

[13]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Vehicle emissions in congestion: Comparison of work zone, rush hour and free-flow conditions , 2011 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[15]  Terje Moen,et al.  Evaluation of IVIS/ADAS using Driving Simulators. Comparing Performance Measures in Different Environments , 2009 .

[16]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing , 2010, Ergonomics.

[17]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Lane Determination With GPS Precise Point Positioning , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Rosta Farzan,et al.  Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise , 2008, CHI.

[21]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[22]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Improving Traffic Flow Efficiency by In-Car Advice on Lane, Speed, and Headway , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Using Adaptive Interfaces to Encourage Smart Driving and Their Effect on Driver Workload , 2017 .

[25]  Andreas Butz,et al.  EcoChallenge: a race for efficiency , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[26]  Chuan Shi Routine Driving Infotainment App : Gamification of Performance Driving , 2012 .

[27]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Persuasive Technology , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Marieke Hendrikje Martens,et al.  Assessing driver’s ability to estimate compliance rates to in-car, advisory driver support , 2014 .

[30]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of a Congestion Assistant on Traffic Flow Efficiency and Safety in Congested Traffic Caused by a Lane Drop , 2010, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[31]  John D. Lee,et al.  The Influence of IVIS Distractions on Tactical and Control Levels of Driving Performance , 2004 .

[32]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Driving Simulators as Research Tools in Traffic Psychology , 2011 .

[33]  Privender Saini,et al.  Individual Differences in Persuadability in the Health Promotion Domain , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[34]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  CoastMaster: An Ambient Speedometer to Gamify Safe Driving , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[35]  Graham K. Edgar,et al.  Accommodation, cognition, and virtual image displays: A review of the literature , 2007, Displays.

[36]  Patrick Hosein,et al.  Application for the Detection of Dangerous Driving and an Associated Gamification Framework , 2016, 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW).

[37]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health , 2014, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[38]  Deborah A. Boehm-Davis,et al.  Effects of Age and Congestion Information Accuracy of Advanced Traveler Information Systems on User Trust and Compliance , 1998 .

[39]  Erel. Avineri APPLYING BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS IN THE DESIGN OF TRAVEL INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[40]  Nadine Sarter,et al.  Multimodal information presentation: Design guidance and research challenges , 2006 .

[41]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[42]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .

[44]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Augmenting human senses to improve the user experience in cars: applying augmented reality and haptics approaches to reduce cognitive distances , 2015, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[45]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[47]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Optimizing Traffic Flow Efficiency by Controlling Lane Changes: Collective, Group, and User Optima , 2017 .

[48]  Haneen Farah,et al.  Multi-Level Driver Workload Prediction using Machine Learning and Off-the-Shelf Sensors , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[49]  Y C Liu,et al.  Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems , 2001, Ergonomics.

[50]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic flow stability , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[51]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[53]  Ming-Hui Wen,et al.  Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  Malte Risto,et al.  Factors influencing compliance to tactical driver advice: An assessment using a think-aloud protocol , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[55]  B. Gardner,et al.  Promoting habit formation , 2013 .

[56]  Ioannis Chatzigiannakis,et al.  Exploiting Gamification to Improve Eco-driving Behaviour: The GamECAR Approach , 2019, BRAINS/WS-AFFIN@AmI.

[57]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  BrainHex: Preliminary Results from a Neurobiological Gamer Typology Survey , 2011, ICEC.

[58]  Birgit Wirtz Persuasive Technology Using Computers To Change What We Think And Do , 2016 .

[59]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Driver's lane keeping ability with eyes off road: Insights from a naturalistic study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[60]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Gender, Age, and Responsiveness to Cialdini's Persuasion Strategies , 2015, PERSUASIVE.