Protecting digital identities in future networks

The basic idea behind the locator/identifier separation in network protocols is to differentiate the location (where) from the entity (who) that is taking part in the communication. But the architectures following this idea are finally associating an entity with the particular device it is using to communicate, which means that actual identity behind the device is not considered enough and that its identifier is somehow disclosed. This behavior manifests different problems, like the traceability and overall privacy, and misses the opportunity to involve the actual identity of the different parties in the communication operation. In this paper we propose an architecture to enhance Future Internet by creating a secure and scalable communication infrastructure to build an identity plane that enhances privacy preventing identity traceability while involving identities in the network operation.

[1]  Pekka Nikander,et al.  Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Architecture , 2006, RFC.

[2]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  Towards the Future Internet , 2010 .

[3]  Xiaohu Xu,et al.  Enhanced MILSA Architecture for Naming, Addressing, Routing and Security Issues in the Next Generation Internet , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[4]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Identity based architecture for secure communication in future internet , 2010, DIM '10.

[5]  Nikos Fotiou,et al.  Illustrating a publish-subscribe Internet architecture , 2012, Telecommun. Syst..

[6]  Tony Li,et al.  Design Goals for Scalable Internet Routing , 2011, RFC.

[7]  Luca Viganò,et al.  Automated Security Protocol Analysis With the AVISPA Tool , 2006, MFPS.

[8]  Luís M. Correia,et al.  4WARD: A European Perspective towards the Future Internet , 2010, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[9]  David R. Karger,et al.  Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications , 2001, SIGCOMM '01.

[10]  Raj Jain,et al.  MILSA: A Mobility and Multihoming Supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture for Naming in the Next Generation Internet , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[11]  Amardeo Sarma,et al.  Identities in the Future Internet of Things , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[12]  Raj Jian,et al.  Internet 3.0: Ten Problems with Current Internet Architecture and Solutions for the Next Generation , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[13]  Jerome H. Saltzer,et al.  On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations , 1993, RFC.

[14]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Networking named content , 2009, CoNEXT '09.