Evolution of Global Product Development Networks: An Exploratory Study

Global Product Development (GPD) networks have evolved to satisfy the unique requirements essential to the successful adoption of corporate outsourcing and offshoring during development processes. Having reviewed the relevant literature associated with GPD, this paper seeks to contribute to the understanding of organizational considerations taken by GPD networks during their transitional processes. A retrospective case study analysis was conducted with 17 Italian companies classified into six GPD configurations (named the “Chess matrix”). Each classification was based on both developmental localization (local versus global) and product development process fragmentation; development activities are either entirely performed within the same development lab, eventually with the contribution of support/adaptive units, or they are split among development units. Using this classification system, an evolutionary model was adopted to illustrate the dynamic paths companies follow when transitioning toward new GPD configurations. With this framework and categorization process, it was deduced that three main variables drove each of the 17 companies: 1) market needs; 2) market extension; and 3) internal needs. These variables were determined based on the GPD approach each company adopted in pursuit of a stable profitable configuration that was achieved by either deliberately remaining in a certain configuration or by employing an evolutionary GPD development configuration. In recognizing that there is not a singularly optimal stable configuration, it is essential to recognize and identify the individual drivers being pursued by each enterprise when implementing specific configurations. Further research will be devoted to more extensively elaborate the paths within a larger sample of companies to identify unrevealed paths and drivers that move companies in their product development globalization efforts.

[1]  Robert Pearce,et al.  The Internationalization of Research and Development: A Firm-level Analysis of Determinants , 1992 .

[2]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[3]  Mehmet Demirbag,et al.  Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions , 2010 .

[4]  Lynne J. Millward,et al.  The telephone medium and semi‐structured interviews: a complementary fit , 2011 .

[5]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Global New Product Development Processes: Preliminary Findings and Research Propositions , 1998 .

[6]  Gianluca Spina,et al.  Internationalisation and outsourcing of operations and product development in the fashion industry , 2015 .

[7]  Stephen Young,et al.  Centralization and autonomy: back to the future , 2004 .

[8]  C. L. Bas,et al.  'Location versus home country advantages' in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies , 2002 .

[9]  Nukhet Harmancioglu Portfolio of controls in outsourcing relationships for global new product development , 2009 .

[10]  Maria Caridi,et al.  Design chain visibility: How much information should you share with your partners during new product development projects? , 2017 .

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Organizing Global Product Development for Complex Engineered Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Surajit Kar,et al.  Managing Global R&D Operations Lessons from the Trenches , 2009 .

[13]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[14]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Continuous learning in global product development: a cross-cultural comparison , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[15]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Coordination in global R&D organizations: An examination of the role of subsidiary mandate and modular product architectures in dispersed R&D organizations , 2014 .

[16]  Gary Hewitt,et al.  Research and Development Performed Abroad by U.S. Manufacturing Multinationals , 1980 .

[17]  Sergio Terzi,et al.  Global Product Development in Italian companies: an empirical analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[19]  Rebecca Harding,et al.  The Internationalisation of German Companies' R&D , 1998, National Institute Economic Review.

[20]  Ulrike de Brentani,et al.  Corporate Culture and Commitment: Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs , 2004 .

[21]  Steven Eppinger,et al.  The new practice of global product development , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  A. Perrino,et al.  Global Management of Technology , 1989 .

[23]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[24]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[25]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[26]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  Integrating Cross-Border Knowledge for Transnational New Product Development , 2006 .

[27]  W Kuemmerle,et al.  Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[28]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A System Architecture Approach to Global Product Development , 2007 .

[29]  V. Chiesa Global R&D Project Management and Organization: A Taxonomy , 2000 .

[30]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The Effects of Outsourcing, Offshoring, and Distributed Product Development Organization on Coordinating the NPD Process , 2007 .

[31]  David A. Griffith,et al.  Governance decisions for the offshore outsourcing of new product development in technology intensive markets , 2009 .

[32]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Practice of Global Product Development ( With Updates by , 2009 .

[33]  Silvia Massini,et al.  A Dynamic Perspective on Next-Generation Offshoring: The Global Sourcing of Science and Engineering Talent , 2008 .

[34]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Beyond Make‐Buy: Internalization and Integration of Design and Production , 2005 .

[35]  Nagesh Kumar Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations , 2001 .

[36]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Managing communication in global product development teams , 1999 .

[37]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Managing the internationalization of R&D activities , 1996 .

[38]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Firm in a World of Outsourcing and Offshoring: The Organizational and Geographical Relocation of High-Value Company Functions , 2010 .