Indicators for Transboundary River Management

The aim of this paper is to analyze the potential of indicators for integrated river basin management and to develop a set of indicators for the management of transboundary river basins. An indicator, comprising a variable or some aggregation of variables, describes a system or process such that it has significance beyond the face value of its components. Integrated river basin management takes into account policies and measures for the multifunctional use of rivers on a catchment scale and associated institutional changes. Indicators are useful instruments for this process for two reasons. Firstly, they meet the information need of policy- and decision-makers. Secondly, indicators can be used to structure the definition and description of information needs and collection of information between the different international, institutional, and sectoral management levels. The development of indicators involves a number of steps: definition of aim, construction of conceptual model, selection of variables, comparison with selection criteria, database assessment, and indicator selection. In this paper these steps are discussed and specified for integrated river basin management. This results in a set of indicators describing the pressure to the river, the state of the river ecosystem, the impact to goods and services provided by the river, and the societal response. The proposed set of indicators measured at a river basin scale provides integrated information on the use and supply of goods and services, underlying cause–effect relationships and possible trade-offs and their spatial distribution (e.g., upstream versus downstream). Furthermore, we propose a division of tasks and responsibilities for river basin management with regard to the development of indicators, data collection, and their application in decision-making.

[1]  D. Bryant,et al.  Environmental indicators : a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development , 1995 .

[2]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  A sustainability indicator for the Dutch environmental policy theme 'Diffusion': cadmium accumulation in soil , 1994 .

[3]  Chris Hope,et al.  An overview of environmental indicators ; state of the art and perspectives , 1994 .

[4]  Peter W. Downs,et al.  How integrated is river basin management? , 1991 .

[5]  I. Bateman,et al.  Managing nutrient fluxes and pollution in the Baltic: An interdisciplinary simulation study , 1999 .

[6]  Luna Bergere Leopold,et al.  The concept of entropy in landscape evolution , 1962 .

[7]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[8]  Y. Ahmad,et al.  Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development , 1989 .

[9]  R. Swart,et al.  Scanning the global environment : a framework and methodology for integrated environmental reporting and assessment , 1995 .

[10]  H. Hosper Clearing lakes : an ecosystem approach to the restoration and management of shallow lakes in the Netherlands , 1997 .

[11]  J. Lekakis,et al.  Bilateral Monopoly: A Market for Intercountry River Water Allocation , 1998, Environmental management.

[12]  N. V. van Straalen,et al.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. , 1989, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[13]  John Holmberg,et al.  Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. , 1996 .

[14]  W. P. Cofino,et al.  Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development , 1997 .

[15]  Jan Eberg,et al.  Waste policy and learning: Policy dynamics of waste management and waste incineration in the Netherlands and Bavaria , 1997 .

[16]  G. McBride,et al.  The “data-rich but information-poor” syndrome in water quality monitoring , 1986 .

[17]  P. Calow,et al.  Essential elements in the case for river conservation , 1992 .