Towards the Personalization of CAPTCHA Mechanisms Based on Individual Differences in Cognitive Processing

This paper studies the effect of individual differences on user performance related to text-recognition CAPTCHA challenges. In particular, a text-recognition CAPTCHA mechanism was deployed in a three-month user study to investigate the effect of individuals’ different cognitive processing abilities, targeting on speed of processing, controlled attention and working memory capacity toward efficiency and effectiveness with regard to different levels of complexity in text-recognition CAPTCHA tasks. A total of 107 users interacted with CAPTCHA challenges between September and November 2012 indicating that the usability of CAPTCHA mechanisms may be supported by personalization techniques based on individual differences in cognitive processing.

[1]  M. Brewer,et al.  Research Design and Issues of Validity , 2000 .

[2]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Do cognitive styles of users affect preference and performance related to CAPTCHA challenges? , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Zach Shipstead,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and the Stroop effect: Do high spans block the words?☆ , 2013 .

[4]  H. Reis,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[5]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm , 2011 .

[6]  John Langford,et al.  CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security , 2003, EUROCRYPT.

[7]  A. Demetriou,et al.  The development of mental processing: efficiency, working memory, and thinking. , 2002, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[8]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[9]  John Langford,et al.  Telling humans and computers apart automatically , 2004, CACM.

[10]  M. A. Anusuya,et al.  Human Intelligence , 1965, Nature.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Images of mind , 1994 .

[12]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Toward an Adaptive and Personalized Web Interaction Using Human Factors , 2009 .

[13]  Kinshuk,et al.  Advanced Adaptivity in Learning Management Systems by Considering Learning Styles , 2009, 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[14]  Artur Lugmayr,et al.  Security and Usability (SECUSAB09) Workshop in the context of International Conference on Availabili , 2009 .

[15]  Yuko Murayama,et al.  Future Challenges in Security and Privacy for Academia and Industry , 2011 .

[16]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[18]  John C. Mitchell,et al.  Text-based CAPTCHA strengths and weaknesses , 2011, CCS '11.

[19]  Artemios G. Voyiatzis,et al.  On the necessity of user-friendly CAPTCHA , 2011, CHI.

[20]  R. Hyman Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .

[21]  Andreas S. Pomportsis,et al.  The value of adaptivity based on cognitive style: an empirical study , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Marc Fischlin,et al.  Breaking reCAPTCHA: A Holistic Approach via Shape Recognition , 2011, SEC.

[23]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[24]  Jeff Yan,et al.  Usability of CAPTCHAs or usability issues in CAPTCHA design , 2008, SOUPS '08.

[25]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[26]  N. Cowan,et al.  The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[27]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[28]  John C. Mitchell,et al.  How Good Are Humans at Solving CAPTCHAs? A Large Scale Evaluation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[29]  Jeff Yan,et al.  A low-cost attack on a Microsoft captcha , 2008, CCS.

[30]  N. Unsworth,et al.  Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model , 2010 .

[31]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  The Adaptive Web, Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[32]  George Spanoudis,et al.  Iv. Results: The Development Of Cognitive Functions , 2002 .

[33]  Manuel Blum,et al.  reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures , 2008, Science.

[34]  T. Klingberg The Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory , 2008 .

[35]  A. Baddeley Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Studying the Effect of Human Cognition on Text and Image Recognition CAPTCHA Mechanisms , 2013, HCI.

[37]  George Spanoudis,et al.  Cycles in speed-working memory-G relations: Towards a developmental–differential theory of the mind , 2013 .

[38]  David Pogue Time to kill off captchas. , 2012, Scientific American.