Accommodating the role of site memory in dynamic species distribution models.

First-order dynamic occupancy models (FODOMs) are a class of state-space model in which the true state (occurrence) is observed imperfectly. An important assumption of FODOMs is that site dynamics only depend on the current state and that variations in dynamic processes are adequately captured with covariates or random effects. However, it is often difficult to understand and/or measure the covariates that generate ecological data, which are typically spatio-temporally correlated. Consequently, the non-independent error structure of correlated data causes underestimation of parameter uncertainty and poor ecological inference. Here, we extend the FODOM framework with a second-order Markov process to accommodate site memory when covariates are not available. Our modeling framework can be used to make reliable inference about site occupancy, colonization, extinction, turnover, and detection probabilities. We present a series of simulations to illustrate the data requirements and model performance. We then applied our modeling framework to 13 years of data from an amphibian community in southern Arizona, USA. In this analysis, we found residual temporal autocorrelation of population processes for most species, even after accounting for long-term drought dynamics. Our approach represents a valuable advance in obtaining inference on population dynamics, especially as they relate to metapopulations.

[1]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States , 2005, Biometrics.

[2]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods , 2006 .

[3]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  An open-population hierarchical distance sampling model. , 2015, Ecology.

[4]  Jeffrey P Hoover Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird , 2003 .

[5]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[6]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[7]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Effects of spatial autocorrelation and imperfect detection on species distribution models , 2018 .

[8]  B. Godley,et al.  Fidelity and over-wintering of sea turtles , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[10]  M. Schaub,et al.  Can temporal covariation and autocorrelation in demographic rates affect population dynamics in a raptor species? , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  L. Bulluck,et al.  Habitat‐dependent occupancy and movement in a migrant songbird highlights the importance of mangroves and forested lagoons in Panama and Colombia , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[12]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[13]  J. Tonkin,et al.  Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Grinnell The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[15]  Richard Fox,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity. , 2007, Ecology.

[16]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  G. De’ath MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION TREES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[18]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[19]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application , 2002 .

[20]  J. Nichols,et al.  Neighborhood and habitat effects on vital rates: expansion of the Barred Owl in the Oregon coast ranges. , 2012, Ecology.

[21]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[22]  M. Williamson Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[23]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  The importance of accounting for spatial and temporal correlation in analyses of ecological data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Statistics for correlated data: phylogenies, space, and time. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical modeling of an invasive spread: the Eurasian Collared-Dove Streptopelia decaocto in the United States. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Sensitivity of species-distribution models to error, bias, and model design: An application to resource selection functions for woodland caribou , 2008 .

[27]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Bayesian Models: A Statistical Primer for Ecologists , 2015 .

[28]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[29]  E. Zipkin,et al.  Disentangling herbivore impacts in primary succession by refocusing the plant stress and vigor hypotheses on phenology , 2019, Ecological Monographs.

[30]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  Model selection for geostatistical models. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  Ben L. Phillips,et al.  The capacity of refugia for conservation planning under climate change , 2015 .

[33]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models , 2002 .

[34]  Shanshan Wu,et al.  Building statistical models to analyze species distributions. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.