Bioprosthetic Valve Remodeling of Trifecta Surgical Valves to Facilitate Valve-in-Valve TAVR

ABSTRACT Background: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (VIV TAVR) is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with failed surgical bioprosthetic valves, but may be complicated by patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). We describe a novel technique – bioprosthetic valve remodeling (BVR) – to distort the frame of Trifecta surgical valves with a high-pressure balloon inflation, allowing for improved expansion and hemodynamics of the transcatheter heart valve (THV). Methods: We performed bench testing of BVR by deploying Portico THVs (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA) inside Trifecta GT valves both at baseline and following BVR. Fluoroscopic and video imaging was performed to assess Trifecta frame distortion, THV expansion, and leaflet motion. Hydrodynamic testing was performed to determine transvalvular gradient under baseline conditions and following BVR. We performed 6 clinical cases of VIV TAVR with Evolut R THVs (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), followed by BVR. Hemodynamic measurements and calculation of the effective orifice area (EOA) were performed at baseline, immediately after implantation of the THV, and after BVR. Results: BVR resulted in an increase in the post-to-post diameter in Trifecta valves, and a lower transvalvular gradient after THV implantation. VIV TAVR and BVR was successful in all cases, with no major short-term complications. The mean baseline transvalvular gradient was 47.5 ± 14.4 mmHg, which was reduced to 21.0 ± 6.2 mmHg after THV implantation, and further reduced to 11.7 ± 4.1 mmHg following BVR. Gradients were stable at 1 month follow up. Conclusion: BVR distorts the frame of Trifecta valves, improving THV expansion and procedural hemodynamics of VIV TAVR.

[1]  D. Dvir,et al.  Bioprosthetic valve fracture: Technical insights from a multicenter study. , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  D. Dvir,et al.  Complications of Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture as an Adjunct to Valve-in-Valve TAVR , 2019, Structural Heart.

[3]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Effect of size and position of self-expanding transcatheter valve on haemodynamics following valve-in-valve procedure in small surgical bioprostheses: an in vitro study. , 2018, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  D. Dvir,et al.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture to Facilitate Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  J. Greisen,et al.  High-pressure balloon fracturing of small dysfunctional Mitroflow bioprostheses facilitates transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Nielsen-Kudsk,et al.  Fracturing mechanics before valve-in-valve therapy of small aortic bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  D. Cohen,et al.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve TAVR: Bench to Bedside. , 2017, Interventional cardiology.

[8]  D. Dvir,et al.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Within Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Leipsic,et al.  In vitro evaluation of implantation depth in valve-in-valve using different transcatheter heart valves. , 2016, EuroIntervention.

[11]  M. Gewillig,et al.  Cracking a tricuspid perimount bioprosthesis to optimize a second transcatheter sapien valve‐in‐valve placement , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  E. Tseng When valve-in-valve implantation is not sufficient: Bioprosthetic Russian dolls. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  J. Oh,et al.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch: Another Reason for TAVR? , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Fracturing the Ring of Small Mitroflow Bioprostheses by High-Pressure Balloon Predilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation. , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  P. Ewert,et al.  Cracking the ring of Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis with ultrahigh pressure balloons prior to transcatheter valve in valve implantation. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  M. Pasic,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. , 2014, JAMA.

[18]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention , 2005, Heart.

[19]  D. Dvir,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for patients with degenerative surgical bioprosthetic valves. , 2015, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.