Scientific Jury Selection: Does It Work?

This article describes different methodologies used to predict the likely disposition of jurors in order to guide the exercise of peremptory challenges. The actual use of these methodologies in 27 telephone surveys, 9 focus groups, and 2 studies of jurors after the case was decided is examined. It is concluded that the efficacy of scientific jury selection depends, in part, on the type of case.

[1]  M. R. Rose.  A Voir Dire of Voir Dire: Listening to Jurors' Views Regarding the Peremptory Challenge , 2003 .

[2]  N. Weiner,et al.  The Use of Peremptory Challenges in Capital Murder Trials: A Legal and Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[3]  W. J. Bowers,et al.  Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Jurors' Race and Jury Racial Composition , 2001 .

[4]  Samuel R. Sommers,et al.  Race in the Courtroom: Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional Attributions , 2000 .

[5]  Vivien Toomey Montz,et al.  The Peremptory Challenge: Should It Still Exist? An Examination of Federal and Florida Law , 2000 .

[6]  B. Bornstein.  The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out? , 1999 .

[7]  Franklin D. Strier.  Whither Trial Consulting? Issues and Projections , 1999 .

[8]  Morris B Hoffman.  Peremptory Challenges Should Be Abolished: A Trial Judge's Perspective , 1997 .

[9]  S. Diamond.  Illuminations and Shadows from Jury Simulations , 1997 .

[10]  Peter Sacks.  Standardized Testing: Meritocracy's Crooked Yardstick. , 1997 .

[11]  J. W. Barber.  The Jury Is Still Out: The Role of Jury Science in the Modern American Courtroom , 1994 .

[12]  N. King.  Postconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decisions , 1993 .

[13]  P. Ellsworth.  Some Steps between Attitudes and Verdicts , 1993 .

[14]  Mark Venuti,et al.  Juror honesty during the voir dire , 1991 .

[15]  Christy A. Visher.  Juror decision making , 1987 .

[16]  Jeffrey T. Frederick.  Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of “scientific jury selection” , 1984 .

[17]  G. Moran,et al.  Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior. , 1982 .

[18]  J. Hepburn.  The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selection , 1980 .

[19]  H. S. Feild,et al.  Simulated Jury Trials: Students vs. “Real” People as Jurors , 1978 .

[20]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court , 1978 .

[21]  Jeffrey T. Frederick,et al.  The Uses of Social Science in Trials With Political and Racial Overtones: The Trial of Joan Little , 1977 .