The maximum capacity, cost, and safety of an automated highway system are largely dependent on the selected headway policy, i.e., the specification of a minimum acceptable headway (as a function of speed) for mainline operations. Here a policy, designed to avert collisions due to "reasonable" lead-car decelerations, is presented and evaluated in the context of achieving high capacity (≥3600 vehicle/lane/hr) over a range of typical highway speeds-13.5 to 30 m/s (30.2 to 67.2 mi/h). This involved a detailed analysis to determine both the relationships between, and the requirements on, the seven parameters which are embedded in this policy. These pertain to systems-level operations, the capabilities of a vehicle's automatic control system, and the vehicle/ roadway interface. The trade-offs associated with safety, capacity, and cost (in the form of required future development efforts) are identified, and three general approaches to selecting parameters for an operational system are specified.
[1]
D. MacKinnon,et al.
High capacity personal rapid transit system developments
,
1975,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[2]
Michael Lenard.
Safety Considerations for a High Density Automated Vehicle System
,
1970
.
[3]
M B Godfrey.
HEADWAY AND SWITCHING STRATEGIES FOR AUTOMATED VEHICULAR GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
,
1966
.
[4]
Robert E. Fenton,et al.
On Vehicle Automatic Longitudinal Control
,
1977
.
[5]
Robert E. Fenton,et al.
FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES IN THE LONGITUDINAL CONTROL OF AUTOMATED GROUND VEHICLES
,
1976
.
[6]
S.C. Plotkin.
A common momentum error in auto accident reconstruction
,
1975,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.