Sensor-Based Analysis of Object-Use Patterns for the Automatic Assessment of Cognitive Status

Indications of cognitive impairments such as dementia and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are often subtle and may be frequently missed by primary care physicians. These impairments are not uncommon: approximately 0.46% of Americans are hospitalized for brain injury each year and it is estimated that by 2050 up to 13 million Americans may have Alzheimer's disease—the most common form of dementia—quadruple the number that did in 2002. This dissertation proposes and investigates ways in which machine inference and wireless sensors can be used to support the assessment of cognitive functioning. The central hypothesis is that object-usage data collected from wireless sensors during the performance of daily activities are sufficient to assess cognitive impairment. I first investigate the ability to recognize individuals based on their sensed object-usage patterns during a simple task. This experiment constitutes an initial step in understanding how well object-use patterns can be automatically observed and analyzed. A preliminary study, using the simple task of preparing a cup of coffee, demonstrated the ability to correctly recognize ten individuals with 77% accuracy based on nine trials from each individual as training data. The dissertation then directly addresses assessment of cognitive impairment with a study in which individuals with TBI made a pot of coffee. Four features were derived from the sensed data and compared to the subjects' scores on standard neuropsychological evaluations. A key result is that Edit Distance, the most knowledge-rich feature, significantly correlates with an apparent indicator of general neuropsychological integrity, namely the first principal component of the neuropsychological assessments. Since cognitive impairments are measured along many dimensions, suggestive correlations between the computed features and individual assessments are also presented. Lastly, I present a preliminary study that investigates the possibility of differentiating impaired individuals from unimpaired individuals. Data was collected from five subjects with TBI and five matched, unimpaired subjects; analysis was done using the same set of computed features. Although the study is preliminary, it is interesting that Edit Distance is able to perfectly differentiate the impaired subjects from the unimpaired and that full results are consistent with those from the assessment study.

[1]  Ronald Poppe,et al.  A survey on vision-based human action recognition , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[2]  Shaogang Gong,et al.  Action categorization with modified hidden conditional random field , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Matthew S. Goodwin,et al.  Recognizing stereotypical motor movements in the laboratory and classroom: a case study with children on the autism spectrum , 2009, UbiComp.

[4]  David Wetherall,et al.  Recognizing daily activities with RFID-based sensors , 2009, UbiComp.

[5]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Home-based cognitive monitoring using embedded measures of verbal fluency in a computer word game , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Structure Learning on Large Scale Common Sense Statistical Models of Human State , 2008, AAAI.

[7]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Designing toys with automatic play characterization for supporting the assessment of a child's development , 2008, IDC.

[8]  James A. Landay,et al.  The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded Activity Recognition System , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[9]  J. Kaye Home-based technologies: A new paradigm for conducting dementia prevention trials , 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[10]  Jesse Hoey,et al.  Assisting persons with dementia during handwashing using a partially observable Markov decision process. , 2007, ICVS 2007.

[11]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition , 2007, UbiComp.

[12]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Learning Large Scale Common Sense Models of Everyday Life , 2007, AAAI.

[13]  Tracey Holsinger,et al.  Does this patient have dementia? , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  M. Pavel,et al.  A Neural Informatics Approach to Cognitive Assessment and Monitoring , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[15]  Nikolaos V. Boulgouris,et al.  Gait Recognition Using Radon Transform and Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Location-Based Activity Recognition , 2005, KI.

[17]  Steven Furnell,et al.  Authenticating mobile phone users using keystroke analysis , 2006, International Journal of Information Security.

[18]  H. Jimison,et al.  Embedded Assessment Algorithms within Home-Based Cognitive Computer Game Exercises for Elders , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Sensor-Based Understanding of Daily Life via Large-Scale Use of Common Sense , 2006, AAAI.

[20]  Kent Larson,et al.  The Design of a Portable Kit of Wireless Sensors for Naturalistic Data Collection , 2006, Pervasive.

[21]  H. Jimison,et al.  Mobility Assessment Using Event-Related Responses , 2006, 1st Transdisciplinary Conference on Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare, 2006. D2H2..

[22]        Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study , 2006 .

[23]  Massimo Barbaro,et al.  A Face Is Exposed for AOL Searcher No , 2006 .

[24]  Anthony P. Glascock,et al.  The Impact of Behavioral Monitoring Technology on the Provision of Health Care in the Home , 2006, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Fine-grained activity recognition by aggregating abstract object usage , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05).

[26]  Matthai Philipose,et al.  Hands-on RFID: wireless wearables for detecting use of objects , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05).

[27]  Jean-Yves Ramel,et al.  Fusion of methods for keystroke dynamic authentication , 2005, Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies (AutoID'05).

[28]  N. Kapur Neuropsychological Assessment, Fourth Edition , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[29]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  RFID-based techniques for human-activity detection , 2005, Commun. ACM.

[30]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities , 2005, IJCAI.

[31]  Matthai Philipose,et al.  Unsupervised Activity Recognition Using Automatically Mined Common Sense , 2005, AAAI.

[32]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Face recognition with image sets using manifold density divergence , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[33]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elders with Cognitive Impairment , 2005, AI Mag..

[34]  S. Okie Traumatic brain injury in the war zone. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  M. Pavel,et al.  Unobtrusive Computer Monitoring of Sensory-Motor Function , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[36]  Donald E. Brown,et al.  Health-status monitoring through analysis of behavioral patterns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[37]  Matthai Philipose,et al.  In-Home Assessment of the Activities of Daily Living of the Elderly , 2005 .

[38]  M.J.E. Salami,et al.  Dynamic keystroke analysis using AR model , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2004. IEEE ICIT '04..

[39]  Bing Jiang,et al.  I Sense a Disturbance in the Force: Unobtrusive Detection of Interactions with RFID-tagged Objects , 2004, UbiComp.

[40]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Opportunity Knocks: A System to Provide Cognitive Assistance with Transportation Services , 2004, UbiComp.

[41]  Xian Ke,et al.  Typing patterns: a key to user identification , 2004, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[42]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Unobtrusive monitoring of computer interactions to detect cognitive status in elders , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[43]  Kent Larson,et al.  Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors , 2004, Pervasive.

[44]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[45]  Context-Aware Computing,et al.  Inferring Activities from Interactions with Objects , 2004 .

[46]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Silhouette Analysis-Based Gait Recognition for Human Identification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[47]  Sakuko Otake,et al.  Long term remote behavioral monitoring of elderly by using sensors installed in ordinary houses , 2002, 2nd Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02EX578).

[48]  Sheryl Zimmerman,et al.  The public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, 2000-2050: potential implication of treatment advances. , 2002, Annual review of public health.

[49]  Talal Al-Shihabi,et al.  Divided Attention and Driving: A Pilot Study Using Virtual Reality Technology , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[50]  Maribeth Gandy Coleman,et al.  The Gesture Pendant: A Self-illuminating, Wearable, Infrared Computer Vision System for Home Automation Control and Medical Monitoring , 2000, Digest of Papers. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[51]  R I Grossman,et al.  Magnetization transfer imaging of traumatic brain injury , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[52]  R. N. Anderson,et al.  A method for constructing complete annual U.S. life tables. , 2000, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[53]  K A Dunn,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[54]  E. Mohr Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders, 2nd edition , 1999 .

[55]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[56]  J E Sniezek,et al.  Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. , 1996, Brain injury.

[57]  Karen Kukich,et al.  Techniques for automatically correcting words in text , 1992, CSUR.

[58]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[59]  Andrew J. Saykin,et al.  Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 1988 .

[60]  Mark L. Mitchell,et al.  Research Design Explained , 1987 .

[61]  S Quick,et al.  International data base. , 1984, POPIN bulletin.

[62]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[63]  Aiko M. Hormann,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning. Part I , 1962, Inf. Control..