Exploring the use of AR technology for co-creative product and packaging design

Abstract Extended Reality technologies, including Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR), are being applied in a wide variety of industrial applications, but their use within design practice remains very limited, despite some promising research activities in this area over the last 20 years. At the same time, design practice has been evolving to place greater emphasis on the role of the client or end-user in the design process through ‘co-creative design’ activities. Whilst offering many benefits, co-creative design activities also present challenges, notably in the communication between designers and non-designers, which can hinder innovation. In this paper, we investigate the potential of a novel, projection-based AR system for the creation of design representations to support co-creative design sessions. The technology is tested through benchmarking experiments and in-situ trials conducted with two industrial partners. Performance metrics and qualitative feedback are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the new technology in supporting co-creative design sessions. Overall, AR technology allows quick, real-time modifications to the surfaces of a physical prototype to try out new ideas. Consequently, designers perceive the possibility to enhance the collaboration with the end-users participating in the session. Moreover, the quality and novelty of ideas generated whilst using projection-based AR outperform conventional sessions or handheld display AR sessions. Whilst the results of these early trials are not conclusive, the results suggest that projection-based AR design representations provide a promising approach to supporting co-creative design sessions.

[1]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[2]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[3]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost , 2011 .

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Mutual awareness in collaborative design: An Augmented Reality integrated telepresence system , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[7]  Ross T. Smith,et al.  Validating Spatial Augmented Reality for interactive rapid prototyping , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[8]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Preparing for the Transfer of Research Results to Practice: Best Practice Heuristics , 2016 .

[9]  O'Hare Jamie,et al.  Developing Metrics to Assess Technology-Enabled Creative Co-Design Sessions , 2016 .

[10]  Jamie O'Hare,et al.  A Review of Augmented Reality Research for Design Practice: Looking to the Future , 2018 .

[11]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  EXPLORING WAYS TO SPEED UP THE APPLICATION OF METRICS TO ASSESS CO-CREATIVE DESIGN SESSIONS , 2018 .

[12]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .

[14]  Bjarki Hallgrimsson,et al.  Prototyping and Modelmaking for Product Design , 2012 .

[15]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  DisplayObjects: prototyping functional physical interfaces on 3d styrofoam, paper or cardboard models , 2010, TEI '10.

[16]  Gilberto Osorio-Gómez,et al.  AIR-MODELLING: A tool for gesture-based solid modelling in context during early design stages in AR environments , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[17]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  Defining requirements for an Augmented Reality system to overcome the challenges of creating and using design representations in co-design sessions , 2018, CoDesign.

[18]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  Exploring The Performance Of Augmented Reality Technologies In Co-Creative Sessions: Initial Results From Controlled Experiments , 2018 .

[19]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Mixed prototyping with configurable physical archetype for usability evaluation of product interfaces , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[20]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  Mixed prototyping for product assessment: a reference framework , 2009 .

[21]  Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca,et al.  Multiplanes: Assisted Freehand VR Drawing , 2017, UIST.

[22]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Understanding Representation in Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  Against Ambiguity , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  D. W. F. van Krevelen,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations , 2010, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[25]  Andrew Irlitti,et al.  Validating Constraint Driven Design Techniques in Spatial Augmented Reality , 2013, AUIC.

[26]  Johann Habakuk Israel,et al.  Investigating three-dimensional sketching for early conceptual design - Results from expert discussions and user studies , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[27]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Boeing’s Wire Bundle Assembly Project , 2001 .

[28]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Connections Between the Design Tool, Design Attributes, and User Preferences in Early Stage Design , 2015 .

[29]  Celine Latulipe,et al.  Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index , 2014, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[30]  Vimal Dhokia,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CO-DESIGN SCENARIOS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SPATIAL-AUGMENTED REALITY DESIGN PLATFORM , 2018 .

[31]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations , 2012 .

[32]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees , 2016 .

[33]  Mikael Söderman Virtual reality in product evaluations with potential customers: An exploratory study comparing virtual reality with conventional product representations , 2005 .

[34]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  A comprehensive survey of augmented reality assembly research , 2016, Advances in Manufacturing.

[35]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[36]  Kwan H. Lee,et al.  Spatial augmented reality for product appearance design evaluation , 2015, J. Comput. Des. Eng..

[37]  Minseok Kim,et al.  Situation-dependent remote AR collaborations: Image-based collaboration using a 3D perspective map and live video-based collaboration with a synchronized VR mode , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[38]  Cédric Masclet,et al.  REAL-TIME CODING METHOD FOR CAPTURE OF ARTEFACT-CENTRIC INTERACTIONS IN CO-CREATIVE DESIGN SESSIONS , 2018 .

[39]  H. IsraelJ.,et al.  Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (SBIM) , 2009 .

[40]  José-Luis Sánchez-Romero,et al.  Augmented and Virtual Reality techniques for footwear , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[41]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Napkin sketch: handheld mixed reality 3D sketching , 2008, VRST '08.

[42]  Gilberto Osorio-Gómez,et al.  Crowdsourcing Augmented Reality Environment (CARE) for aesthetic evaluation of products in conceptual stage , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[43]  Jouke Verlinden Developing an Interactive Augmented Prototyping Methodology to Support Design Reviews , 2014 .

[44]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.