Selectivity Correction in Discrete-Continuous Models for the Willingness to Work as Crowd-Shippers and Travel Time Tolerance

The objective of this study is to understand the different behavioral considerations that govern the choice of people to engage in a crowd-shipping market. Using novel data collected by the researchers in the US, we develop discrete-continuous models. A binary logit model has been used to estimate crowd-shippers' willingness to work, and an ordinary least-square regression model has been employed to calculate crowd-shippers' maximum tolerance for shipping and delivery times. A selectivity-bias term has been included in the model to correct for the conditional relationships of the crowd-shipper's willingness to work and their maximum travel time tolerance. The results show socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. age, gender, race, income, and education level), transporting freight experience, and number of social media usages significant influence the decision to participate in the crowd-shipping market. In addition, crowd-shippers pay expectations were found to be reasonable and concurrent with the literature on value-of-time. Findings from this research are helpful for crowd-shipping companies to identify and attract potential shippers. In addition, an understanding of crowd-shippers - their behaviors, perceptions, demographics, pay expectations, and in which contexts they are willing to divert from their route - are valuable to the development of business strategies such as matching criteria and compensation schemes for driver-partners.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions , 2005 .

[2]  Mickael Briffaz,et al.  Crowd-shipping in Geneva Exploratory and descriptive study of Crowd-shipping , 2016 .

[3]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Transport reduction by crowdsourced deliveries – a library case in Finland , 2016 .

[4]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  A NOTE ON ENDOGENOUS VARIABLES IN HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE UTILIZATION EQUATIONS , 1986 .

[5]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Nested Extreme Value (MDCNEV) Model: Formulation and Application to Non-worker Activity Time-Use and Timing Behavior on Weekdays , 2010 .

[6]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Crowd-Shipping Services for Last Mile Delivery: Analysis from Survey Data in Two Countries , 2018 .

[7]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[8]  Fred Mannering,et al.  Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium with Discrete/Continuous Econometric Models , 1990, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Lina Kattan,et al.  Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpooling system , 2016 .

[10]  D Damm,et al.  A Theory of Activity Scheduling Behavior , 1981 .

[11]  F. Mannering,et al.  A DYNAMIC EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND UTILIZATION , 1985 .

[12]  C. Bhat The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model : Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions , 2008 .

[13]  K. Train Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand , 1985 .

[14]  Fred Mannering,et al.  Modeling Travelers' Postwork Activity Involvement: Toward a New Methodology , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Discrete/continuous econometric models and their application to transport analysis , 1987 .

[16]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Rideshare mode potential in non-metropolitan areas of the northeastern United States , 2016 .

[18]  Samer Madanat,et al.  SELECTIVITY BIAS IN MODELING HIGHWAY PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS , 1998 .

[19]  Frank W. Milthorpe,et al.  Selectivity correction in discrete-continuous choice analysis: With Empirical Evidence for Vehicle Choice and Use , 1987 .

[20]  Yu Nie,et al.  Crowdsourced Urban Package Delivery , 2017 .

[21]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  SELECTIVITY BIAS IN MODELS OF DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS CHOICE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1986 .