A supervised vibration-based statistical methodology for damage detection under varying environmental conditions & its laboratory assessment with a scale wind turbine blade☆

The problem of vibration-based damage detection under varying environmental conditions and uncertainty is considered, and a novel, supervised, PCA-type statistical methodology is postulated. The methodology employs vibration data records from the healthy and damaged states of a structure under various environmental conditions. Unlike standard PCA-type methods in which a feature vector corresponding to the least important eigenvalues is formed in a single step, the postulated methodology uses supervised learning in which damaged-state data records are employed to sequentially form a feature vector by appending a transformed scalar element at a time under the condition that it optimally, among all remaining elements, improves damage detectability. This leads to the formulation of feature vectors with optimized sensitivity to damage, and thus high damage detectability. Within this methodology three particular methods, two non-parametric and one parametric, are formulated. These are validated and comparatively assessed via a laboratory case study focusing on damage detection on a scale wind turbine blade under varying temperature and the potential presence of sprayed water. Damage detection performance is shown to be excellent based on a single vibration response sensor and a limited frequency bandwidth.

[1]  Surendra N. Ganeriwala,et al.  Modes Indicate Cracks in Wind Turbine Blades , 2011 .

[2]  Luigi Garibaldi,et al.  PCA-based detection of damage in time-varying systems , 2010 .

[3]  André Preumont,et al.  Vibration based damage detection using large array sensors and spatial filters , 2006 .

[4]  Reimondas Sliteris,et al.  The review of non-destructive testing techniques suitable for inspection of the wind turbine blades , 2008 .

[5]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[6]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches , 2002 .

[7]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[8]  Yaoyu Li,et al.  A review of recent advances in wind turbine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power Electronics and Machines in Wind Applications.

[9]  Shyh-Jier Huang,et al.  Enhancement of damage-detection of wind turbine blades via CWT-based approaches , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[10]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Vibration based Structural Health Monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment , 2008 .

[11]  Marek Krawczuk,et al.  Damage detection in turbine wind blades by vibration based methods , 2009 .

[12]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics , 2011 .

[13]  Hyung Jin Lim,et al.  Impedance based damage detection under varying temperature and loading conditions , 2011 .

[14]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Damage diagnosis under environmental and operational variations using unsupervised support vector machine , 2009 .

[16]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Damage Detection Accommodating Varying Environmental Conditions , 2006 .

[17]  Keith Worden,et al.  Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  H. R. Kess,et al.  Investigation of operational and environmental variability effects on damage detection algorithms in a woven composite plate , 2007 .

[19]  Jonathon A. Chambers,et al.  Experience with bicoherence of electrical power for condition monitoring of wind turbine blades , 1998 .

[20]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Statistical Time Series Methods for Vibration Based Structural Health Monitoring , 2013 .

[22]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[23]  J. D. Hios,et al.  Stochastic identification of temperature effects on the dynamics of a smart composite beam: assessment of multi-model and global model approaches , 2009 .

[24]  Cecilia Surace,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: A negative selection approach , 2010 .

[25]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge , 1999 .

[26]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  UNCERTAIN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS IDENTIFICATION VIA A RANDOM COEFFICIENT ARX MODEL BASED METHOD , 2012 .

[27]  Hyun-Man Cho,et al.  Vibration-Based Damage Monitoring in Model Plate-Girder Bridges under Uncertain Temperature Conditions , 2007 .

[28]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Vibration based health monitoring for a lightweight truss structure: experimental assessment of several statistical time series methods , 2010 .

[29]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Merging Sensor Data from Multiple Temperature Scenarios for Vibration Monitoring of Civil Structures , 2008 .