Fast reconstruction of 3-D defect profile from MFL signals using key physics-based parameters and SVM

Abstract Fast reconstruction of three-dimensional (3-D) defect profile from three-axis magnetic flux leakage (MFL) signals is important to the pipeline inline inspection (ILI) in the oil and gas industry. Traditional methods require the processing of a large amount of raw input and output data, which poses significant challenges in balancing the inspection efficiency, i.e. sensing and data processing speed, and the ILI accuracy and robustness. Here, a novel fast reconstruction framework combining key physics-based parameters and data-driven machine learning algorithms is proposed. Geometric parameters based rational Bezier curve (RBC) model is proposed to generate the 3-D defect profile, while local and global feature parameters are determined using a nonlinear least square (NLS) approach from the three-axis MFL signals. These physics-based geometric and feature parameters are then correlated through a least-square support vector machine (LS-SVM). Meanwhile, a pipeline inspection gauge (PIG) is developed to measure the three-axis MFL signals for evaluating the reconstruction performance through field testing. Both simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method's accuracy, robustness and computation speed have been improved significantly comparing with other existing methods.

[1]  Debmalya Mukherjee,et al.  Inverse mapping of magnetic flux leakage signal for defect characterization , 2013 .

[2]  Haiqing Li,et al.  Flow Pattern Identification Based on EMD and LS-SVM for Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Minichannel , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Numerical simulation on magnetic flux leakage evaluation at high speed , 2006 .

[4]  Jian Feng,et al.  Fast reconstruction of defect profiles from magnetic flux leakage measurements using a RBFNN based error adjustment methodology , 2017 .

[5]  Gwan Soo Park,et al.  A New Sensitive Excitation Technique in Nondestructive Inspection for Underground Pipelines by Using Differential Coils , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Changlong Wang,et al.  LS-SVMs-based reconstruction of 3-D defect profile from magnetic flux leakage signals , 2007 .

[7]  Gerald E. Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer-aided geometric design - a practical guide, 4th Edition , 1997, Computer science and scientific computing.

[8]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Pulsed Eddy Current Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation: A Review , 2017 .

[9]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional defect inversion from magnetic flux leakage signals using iterative neural network , 2015 .

[10]  Javier García-Martín,et al.  Non-Destructive Techniques Based on Eddy Current Testing , 2011, Sensors.

[11]  Zheng Liu,et al.  Survey: State of the Art in NDE Data Fusion Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  S. Udpa,et al.  Adaptive Wavelets for Characterizing Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals From Pipeline Inspection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Yihua Kang,et al.  Theoretical Analyses of MFL Signal Affected by Discontinuity Orientation and Sensor-Scanning Direction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  Ping Wang,et al.  Defect Profile Estimation from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal via Efficient Managing Particle Swarm Optimization , 2014, Sensors.

[15]  Jian Feng,et al.  Window Feature-Based Two-Stage Defect Identification Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Gwan Soo Park,et al.  Analysis of the velocity-induced eddy current in MFL type NDT , 2004 .

[17]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Pulsed magnetic flux leakage techniques for crack detection and characterisation , 2006 .

[18]  Xin Liu,et al.  Electromagnetic Imaging Methods for Nondestructive Evaluation Applications , 2011, Sensors.

[19]  Songling Huang,et al.  Reconstruction of 3-D defect profiles from MFL signals using radial wavelet basis function neural network , 2014 .

[20]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Crack Shape Reconstruction in Eddy Current Testing Using Machine Learning Systems for Regression , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[21]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterisation , 2006 .

[22]  Dazhong Ma,et al.  Quick Reconstruction of Arbitrary Pipeline Defect Profiles From MFL Measurements Employing Modified Harmony Search Algorithm , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  Jian Feng,et al.  A Sensor Liftoff Modification Method of Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal for Defect Profile Estimation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[24]  João M.A. Rebello,et al.  Development of a magnetic sensor for detection and sizing of internal pipeline corrosion defects , 2009 .

[25]  Josef Hoschek,et al.  Handbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design , 2002 .

[26]  M. Nabi,et al.  Improved FEM model for defect-shape construction from MFL signal by using genetic algorithm , 2007 .

[27]  Yoshihiro Nakamura,et al.  Detection of Inner Cracks in Thick Steel Plates Using Unsaturated AC Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing With a Magnetic Resistance Gradiometer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[28]  Sofiène Tahar,et al.  Self-Organizing Map-Based Feature Visualization and Selection for Defect Depth Estimation in Oil and Gas Pipelines , 2015, 2015 19th International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[29]  Babak Nadjar Araabi,et al.  Estimation of Depth and Length of Defects From Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements: Verification With Simulations, Experiments, and Pigging Data , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[30]  Luis Volnei Sudati Sagrilo,et al.  MFL signals and artificial neural networks applied to detection and classification of pipe weld defects , 2006 .

[31]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Multifrequency Excitation and Support Vector Machine Regressor for ECT Defect Characterization , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[32]  Horst Nowacki,et al.  Five decades of Computer-Aided Ship Design , 2010, Comput. Aided Des..

[33]  N.K. Nikolova,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques for the Analysis of Magnetic Flux Leakage Images in Pipeline Inspection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[34]  J. Reilly,et al.  Sizing of 3-D Arbitrary Defects Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[35]  M.N.S. Swamy,et al.  Neural Networks and Statistical Learning , 2013 .

[36]  Que Pei-wen,et al.  3D FEM analysis in magnetic flux leakage method , 2006 .

[37]  Lalita Udpa,et al.  Electromagnetic NDE signal inversion by function-approximation neural networks , 2002 .

[38]  Fengzhu Ji,et al.  Finite-Element Neural Network-Based Solving 3-D Differential Equations in MFL , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[39]  Bin Wu,et al.  Dipole modeling of stress-dependent magnetic flux leakage , 2018 .

[40]  Andrei A. Snarskii,et al.  An integral equation model for the magnetic flux leakage method , 2010 .