External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey

This paper presents the strategies that low- and medium-technology (LMT) firms adopt to generate technological innovation and investigates the impact of these approaches on the firms' innovation performances. These analyses are based on a sample from the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey totalling 753 LMT firms. The descriptive statistics show that about 95% of the firms acquired technology by technology licensing, while 32% of the firms engaged in R&D outsourcing. The firms in the sample acquiring external technological knowledge through collaboration with suppliers, clients, competitors, and research organizations are about 20%, 18%, 8%, and 23%, respectively. Using a moderated hierarchical regression analysis, this study reveals interesting results. First, inward technology licensing does not contribute significantly to innovation performance. Second, internal R&D investment negatively moderates the effect of R&D outsourcing on innovation performance. Third, internal R&D investment contingently impacts the different types of partners on innovation performance: by collaborating with different types of partners, firms with more internal R&D investment gain higher innovation returns than firms with fewer internal R&D activities. The results of this study contribute to a sharper understanding of technological innovation strategies and their effects on technological innovation performance in LMT sectors.

[1]  Teresa García-Marco,et al.  Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2001 .

[2]  Martin Hemmert,et al.  The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan , 2004 .

[3]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .

[4]  B. H. Jørgensen,et al.  The dynamic creation of knowledge: Analysing public-private collaborations , 2005 .

[5]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[6]  David Wilemon,et al.  Excelling in R&D , 2000 .

[7]  Z. Griliches.  Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint , 1998 .

[8]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[9]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[10]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park , 2006 .

[11]  Timothy Schoenecker,et al.  Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[12]  S. Girma.  Technology Transfer from Acquisition FDI and the Absorptive Capacity of Domestic Firms: An Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[13]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[14]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[15]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[16]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[18]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[19]  Harsha Aturupane.  Poverty, human development and growth : an emerging consensus? , 1994 .

[20]  A. Gambardella.  Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[21]  Leo A. Grünfeld,et al.  Meet me halfway but don’t rush: absorptive capacity and strategic R&D investment revisited , 2003 .

[22]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[23]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[24]  Toru Yoshikawa,et al.  Technology development and acquisition strategy , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[26]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[27]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[28]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[29]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[30]  F. Martin,et al.  The economic impact of Canadian university R&D , 1998 .

[31]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[32]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[33]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[34]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  Inward Technology Licensing and Firm Performance: A Longitudinal Study , 2007 .

[35]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[36]  S. Zahra,et al.  Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization , 2002 .

[37]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[38]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Learning in strategic technology alliances , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[41]  P. Bierly,et al.  Determinants of technology cycle time in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[42]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  The R&D Performance in Taiwan's Electronics Industry: A Longitudinal Examination , 2004 .

[43]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[44]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[45]  J. Liker,et al.  Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a US and Japan comparative study , 1999 .

[46]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Customers' perspectives of involvement in new product development , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[48]  Pilar Vargas Montoya,et al.  Does the Technological Sourcing Decision Matter? Evidence from Spanish Panel Data , 2007 .

[49]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[50]  Gary K. Jones,et al.  Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition , 2001 .

[51]  D. De Clercq,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study , 2004 .

[52]  Svein Ulset.  R&D outsourcing and contractual governance: An empirical study of commercial R&D projects , 1996 .

[53]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  New ventures' inward licensing: examining the effects of industry and strategy characteristics , 2005 .

[54]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[55]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY? , 1997 .

[56]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[57]  Almas Heshmati,et al.  Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: : A firm-level innovation study , 2002 .

[58]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[59]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[60]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[61]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[62]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[63]  G. Hamel,et al.  Competence-based competition , 1994 .

[64]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[65]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[66]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Cooperation and the Ability to Minimize the Time and Cost of New Product Development within the Spanish Automotive Supplier Industry , 2003 .

[67]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[68]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[69]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[70]  Jennifer W. Spencer,et al.  Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry , 2003 .

[71]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[72]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge‐Based and Information‐Processing Perspective* , 2005 .

[73]  Anders Drejer,et al.  Organisational learning and competence development , 2000 .

[74]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science , 2006 .

[75]  Niels Noorderhaven,et al.  External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry , 2002 .

[76]  N. Foss.  Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments , 1996 .

[77]  S. Zahra.  Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment , 1996 .

[78]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[79]  Julian Lowe,et al.  R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets , 1998 .

[80]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries , 2000 .