Lean Production and the Toyota Production System Or, the Case of the Forgoften Production Concepts

Advocates and critics alike have accepted 'lean' images of the Toyota production system. But certain production concepts that are integral to Toyota production system theory and practice actually impede 'leanness'. The most important of these are the concepts of heijunka, or levelled ('balanced') production, and muri, or waste from overstressing machines and personnel. Actual Toyota production systems exist as a compromise between these concepts and the pursuit of leanness via kaizen. The compromise between these contrasting tendencies is influenced by the ability of unions and other aspects of industrial relations regulation to counter practices such as shortnotice overtime and 'management by stress'.

[1]  M. Pohjola,et al.  Social corporatism : a superior economic system? , 1994 .

[2]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[3]  Russell D. Lansbury,et al.  International and Comparative Employment Relations , 2000 .

[4]  A. Adcroft,et al.  Against lean production , 1992 .

[5]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[6]  P. Evans,et al.  The global challenge : Australian manufacturing in the 1990s , 1990 .

[7]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[8]  Jos Benders,et al.  Leaving Lean? Recent Changes in the Production Organization of some Japanese Car Plants , 1996 .

[9]  J. Johnson,et al.  Karoshi—Death from Overwork: Occupational Health Consequences of Japanese Production Management , 1997, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[10]  W. Nord,et al.  The Transformation of Work , 1989 .

[11]  R. Hyman,et al.  Industrial Relations in the New Europe , 1993 .

[12]  R. Florida,et al.  Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labor Process in Japan , 1988 .

[13]  Joe B. Moore.  Japanese Industrial Relations , 1987 .

[14]  J. Mathews,et al.  Two Models of Award Restructuring in Australia , 1990 .

[15]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[16]  The Politics of flexibility : restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany, and Scandinavia , 1991 .

[17]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[18]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Japan's role in a post-fordist age , 1989 .

[19]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[20]  U. Jürgens,et al.  From "Fordism" to "Toyotism"? The Social Organization of the Labor Process in the Japanese Automobile Industry , 1985 .

[21]  A. Sayer.  New developments in manufacturing: the just-in-time system , 1986 .

[22]  Ian Hampson,et al.  Post-Fordism and Workplace Change: Towards a Critical Research Agenda , 1994 .

[23]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry. , 1989 .

[24]  Christian Berggren,et al.  Japan as Number Two: Competitive Problems and the Future of Alliance Capitalism after the Burst of the Bubble Boom , 1995 .

[25]  G. Sewell,et al.  `Someone to Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process , 1992 .

[26]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[27]  W. Sengenberger,et al.  Creating economic opportunities. The role of labour standards in industrial restructuring , 1994 .

[28]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  The Japanization of British industry , 1988 .

[29]  Åke Sandberg.  Enriching Production: Perspectives on Volvo's Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production , 1995 .

[30]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .