Challenges in Soft-Linking: The Case of EMEC and TIMES-Sweden

The aim of this study is to develop a method for how to soft-link a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model with a energy system model. The central research question is how the interaction between modellers and models can, both qualitatively and quantitatively, enable and facilitate a transparent energy and climate policy decision-making process at the national level. The paper describes this development in detail, and presents and discusses the results of the soft-linking methodology applied to a climate scenario. Important similarities and differences between two Swedish models, i.e. EMEC (a CGE model) and TIMES-Sweden (an energy system model), are identified. These findings are used to develop a robust and transparent method to translate simulation results between the two models, resulting in intermediate ‘translation models’ between EMEC and TIMES-Sweden. EMEC provides demand input to TIMES, while TIMES provides feedback on the energy efficiency parameters, the energy mix, and the prices of electricity and heat. These ‘translations’ can also be used stand-alone to feed into other energy system models. The presented soft-linking process demonstrates the importance of linking an energy system model with a macroeconomic model when studying energy and climate policy. With the same exogenous parameters, the soft-linking between the models results in a new picture of the economy and the energy system in 2035 compared with the corresponding model results in the absence of soft-linking. The study also leads to a better understanding of how the models can interact while preserving the respective models' strengths, to give an improved picture of both the flows in the economy and the impact of energy policy instruments.

[1]  Christopher J. A. Macleod,et al.  Modellers' roles in structuring integrative research projects , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  L. Glosten,et al.  Equilibrium in an Electronic Open Limit Order Book , 1992 .

[3]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Energy and Climate Policy Analysis with the Hybrid Bottom-Up Computable General Equilibrium Model SCREEN: The Case of the Swiss CO2 Act , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Göran Östblom,et al.  The EMEC model: Version 2.0 , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Integrating Bottom-Up into Top-Down: A Mixed Complementarity Approach , 2005 .

[6]  K. Nilsson Do Fundamentals Explain the Behavior of the Real Effective Exchange Rate , 2002 .

[7]  T. Rutherford Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis , 1995 .

[8]  Júlia Seixas,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up modelling to support low-carbon scenarios: climate policy implications , 2013 .

[9]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use of computer-based support tools in policy relevant research , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[11]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: The case of Sweden , 2011 .

[12]  R. Loulou,et al.  Documentation for the TIMES Model PART I April 2005 , 2005 .

[13]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Integrated assessment of energy policies: Decomposing top-down and bottom-up , 2009 .

[14]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MARKAL-MACRO: A linked model for energy-economy analysis , 1992 .

[15]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[16]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  P. Linares,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Simulate the Impacts of Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes , 2009 .

[18]  Eva Samakovlis,et al.  Linking health and productivity impacts to climate policy costs: a general equilibrium analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models , 2008, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[20]  J. Swisher,et al.  Exploring the gap : Top-down versus bottom-up analyses of the cost of mitigating global warming , 1993 .

[21]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[22]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling , 1998 .

[23]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Experiments with a Hybrid CGE-MARKAL Model1 , 2006 .

[24]  T. Lindström The Role of High-Tech Capital Formation for Swedish Productivity Growth* , 2003 .

[25]  Thomas Martinsen,et al.  Introducing technology learning for energy technologies in a national CGE model through soft links to global and national energy models , 2011 .

[26]  Permanent Shocks and Spillovers: A Sectoral Approach Using a Structural VAR , 1998 .

[27]  C.-O. Wene,et al.  Energy-Economy-Analysis. Linking the Macroeconomic and Systems Engineering Approaches , 1996 .