Development, Reliability, and Validity of an Urban Trail Use Survey

Purpose. To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Research on Urban Trail Environments (ROUTES) Trail Use Questionnaire. Design. Test-retest reliability was assessed by repeated measures (study 1); validity was assessed by comparing reported trail use to self-reported and objectively measured physical activity (PA) levels (study 2). Setting. Study 1: a religious institution situated near a Los Angeles trail. Study 2: 1-mile buffer zones surrounding three urban trails (Chicago, Dallas, and Los Angeles). Subjects. Thirty-four adults between 40 and 60 years of age (10 men and 24 women) completed the ROUTES questionnaire twice (study 1). Study 2 participants were 490 adults (48% female and 73% white), mean age 48 years. Measures. Trail use for recreation and transportation purposes, time and distance spent on trails, and characteristics of the trail and other trail users. PA was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and accelerometry. Analyses. Pearson correlation coefficients and κ statistics were used for test-retest reliability for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate hypotheses on PA comparing trail users and nonusers. Results. Test-retest statistics were acceptable (κ = .57, r 5 .66). Validity was supported by correlations between indices of trail use with self-reported PA and accelerometry, and significant group differences between trail users and nonusers in PA levels. Conclusions. The ROUTES Trail Use Questionnaire demonstrated good reliability and validity.

[1]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  D R Jacobs,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[4]  O. Furuseth,et al.  Who's on the greenway: Socioeconomic, demographic, and locational characteristics of greenway users , 1991 .

[5]  Paul H. Gobster,et al.  Perception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation , 1995 .

[6]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[8]  R. Yabes,et al.  Urban waterways: changing historical uses and users in a southwestern desert city , 1997 .

[9]  J. Sallis,et al.  Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  J. Kampert,et al.  Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. , 1999, JAMA.

[12]  G. Lindsey.  Use of urban greenways: insights from Indianapolis☆ , 1999 .

[13]  K. Flegal,et al.  Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[14]  J F Sallis,et al.  Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Access, Equity, and Urban Greenways: An Exploratory Investigation , 2001 .

[16]  R. Pate,et al.  Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[17]  Bongkoo Lee,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Leisure Experience: An Application of Affect Control Theory , 2002 .

[18]  L. Gardner,et al.  Test‐retest Reliability of a Complex Human Immunodeficiency Virus Research Questionnaire Administered by an Audio Computer‐assisted Self‐interviewing System , 2003, Medical care.

[19]  James O. Hill,et al.  Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2003, Science.

[20]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  Janice L. Thompson,et al.  Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire on physical activity and its correlates among women from diverse racial and ethnic groups. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  Dawn K. Wilson,et al.  Awareness and use of community walking trails. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[23]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Use of Greenway Trails in Indiana , 2004 .

[24]  S. Zizzi,et al.  Use of a Community Trail Among New and Habitual Exercisers: A Preliminary Assessment , 2004, Preventing chronic disease.

[25]  Robert J. Bensley,et al.  The eHealth Behavior Management Model: A Stage-based Approach to Behavior Change and Management , 2004, Preventing chronic disease.

[26]  P. Gobster.  Recreation and Leisure Research from an Active Living Perspective: Taking a Second Look at Urban Trail Use Data , 2005 .

[27]  Rebecca E Lee,et al.  The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods , 2005, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[28]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  Development and Reliability and Validity Testing of an Audit Tool for Trail/Path Characteristics: The Path Environment Audit Tool (PEAT). , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[29]  Susan Weaver,et al.  Trail Characteristics as Correlates of Urban Trail Use , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[30]  A. Bauman,et al.  Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  D. Spruijt-Metz,et al.  Reasons for urban trail use predict levels of trail-related physical activity. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.