‘Not hard to sway’: a case study of student engagement in two large engineering classes

ABSTRACT Although engineering education research has empirically validated the effectiveness of active learning in improving student learning over traditional lecture-based methods, the adoption of active learning in classrooms has been slow. One of the greatest reported barriers is student resistance towards engagement in active learning exercises. This paper argues that the level of student engagement in active learning classrooms is an interplay of social and physical classroom characteristics. Using classroom observations and instructor interviews, this study describes the influence of the interaction of student response systems and classroom layout on student engagement in two large active-learning-based engineering classrooms. The findings suggest that the use of different student response systems in combination with cluster-style seating arrangements can increase student engagement in large classrooms.

[1]  M. O'hare.  Classroom design for discussion-based teaching , 1998 .

[2]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Findings from classroom observations of 58 math and science faculty , 2012 .

[3]  E. Grulke,et al.  The Effects of Physical Environment on Engineering Team Performance: A Case Study , 2001 .

[4]  Prateek Shekhar,et al.  Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning , 2015 .

[5]  Carla Carnaghan,et al.  Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations , 2011 .

[6]  Debra Larson,et al.  Active learning in a Finnish engineering university course , 2004 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[8]  Nancy E. Hood-Smith,et al.  The Impact of Physical Space Alteration on Disruptive Classroom Behavior: A Case Study. , 1983 .

[9]  Jonathan Cole,et al.  Using continuous assessment to promote student engagement in a large class , 2012 .

[10]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  The influence of podcasting on student learning: a case study across two courses , 2013 .

[11]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom , 1996 .

[12]  Bracha Alpert,et al.  Students' Resistance in the Classroom , 1991 .

[13]  R. Sommer,et al.  Small group ecology. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  David A. Karp,et al.  The college classroom: Some observations on the meanings of student participation. , 1976 .

[15]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems , 2007 .

[16]  Caroline Guardino,et al.  Changing Behaviors by Changing the Classroom Environment , 2010 .

[17]  R. Burnstein,et al.  Using Wireless Keypads in Lecture Classes , 2001 .

[18]  R. Sommer,et al.  The soft classroom 17 years later , 1992 .

[19]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind,et al.  Enhancing Self‐Directed Learning through Educational Technology: When Students Resist the Change , 1999 .

[20]  Jesús Félez,et al.  Experiences in education innovation: developing tools in support of active learning , 2006 .

[21]  Douglas Amedeo,et al.  ACTIVITY-ENHANCING ARENAS OF DESIGNS: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLASSROOM LAYOUT , 2003 .

[22]  Ines Lopez Arteaga,et al.  Example of good practice of a learning environment with a classroom response system in a mechanical engineering bachelor course , 2013 .

[23]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Social Loafing: Research Findings, Implications, and Future Directions , 1995 .

[24]  S. Lei,et al.  Classroom Physical Design Influencing Student Learning and Evaluations of College Instructors: A Review of Literature. , 2010 .

[25]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Influence of engineering instructors' teaching and learning beliefs on pedagogies in engineering science courses , 2013 .

[26]  Molly Espey,et al.  Does Space Matter? Classroom Design and Team-Based Learning , 2008 .

[27]  Trudie Aberdeen.  Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[28]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[29]  Catherine E. Brawner,et al.  Technology in Engineering Education: What Do the Faculty Know and Want? , 1999 .

[30]  C. Auster,et al.  The Classroom as a Negotiated Social Setting: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Faculty Members' Behavior on Students' Participation. , 1994 .

[31]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project , 2003 .

[32]  Billy L. Crynes,et al.  A Review of Literature on Effectiveness of Use of Information Technology in Education , 2000 .

[33]  William G. Griswold,et al.  The Activeclass Project: Experiments in Encouraging Classroom Participation , 2003, CSCL.

[34]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[35]  K. Tanner,et al.  “What if students revolt?”—Considering Student Resistance: Origins, Options, and Opportunities for Investigation , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[36]  H. P. Hornæs,et al.  Aptitude, Gender, and Computer Algebra Systems , 2000 .

[37]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning , 2003 .

[38]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  Engineering Students' Intelligence Beliefs and Learning , 2014 .

[39]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  Impact of Cold-Calling on Student Voluntary Participation , 2013 .

[40]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[41]  E. Graaff,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning * , 2022 .

[42]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[43]  Gary R. Byrd,et al.  Classroom Seating , 1980 .

[44]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[45]  George Sugai,et al.  Evidence-based Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice , 2008 .

[46]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[47]  Aruna Shekar,et al.  Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education , 2007 .

[48]  Katherine A. Friedrich,et al.  9: Thawing the Chilly Climate: Inclusive Teaching Resources for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math , 2008 .

[49]  Shane Donohue,et al.  Supporting active learning in an undergraduate geotechnical engineering course using group-based audience response systems quizzes , 2014 .

[50]  J. Finn,et al.  The “Why’s” of Class Size: Student Behavior in Small Classes , 2003 .

[51]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2013 .

[52]  Margaret Volante.  Qualitative research. , 2008, Nurse researcher.

[53]  L. Farmer,et al.  Does the Distance from the Teacher Influence Student Evaluations , 2005 .

[54]  G. Sugai,et al.  Using Active Supervision and Precorrection to Improve Transition Behaviors in an Elementary School , 1997 .