Ethics of Using and Sharing Clinical Imaging Data for Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Framework.

In this article, the authors propose an ethical framework for using and sharing clinical data for the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The philosophical premise is as follows: when clinical data are used to provide care, the primary purpose for acquiring the data is fulfilled. At that point, clinical data should be treated as a form of public good, to be used for the benefit of future patients. In their 2013 article, Faden et al argued that all who participate in the health care system, including patients, have a moral obligation to contribute to improving that system. The authors extend that framework to questions surrounding the secondary use of clinical data for AI applications. Specifically, the authors propose that all individuals and entities with access to clinical data become data stewards, with fiduciary (or trust) responsibilities to patients to carefully safeguard patient privacy, and to the public to ensure that the data are made widely available for the development of knowledge and tools to benefit future patients. According to this framework, the authors maintain that it is unethical for providers to "sell" clinical data to other parties by granting access to clinical data, especially under exclusive arrangements, in exchange for monetary or in-kind payments that exceed costs. The authors also propose that patient consent is not required before the data are used for secondary purposes when obtaining such consent is prohibitively costly or burdensome, as long as mechanisms are in place to ensure that ethical standards are strictly followed. Rather than debate whether patients or provider organizations "own" the data, the authors propose that clinical data are not owned at all in the traditional sense, but rather that all who interact with or control the data have an obligation to ensure that the data are used for the benefit of future patients and society.

[1]  C. Langlotz,et al.  A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop. , 2019, Radiology.

[2]  Marcus A. Badgeley,et al.  Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning models , 2018, ArXiv.

[3]  Scott D. Kahn,et al.  Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons , 2019, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[4]  Richard Milne,et al.  Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia , 2019, Human Genetics.

[5]  John Wilbanks,et al.  Creating a data resource: what will it take to build a medical information commons? , 2017, Genome Medicine.

[6]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Use and Understanding of Anonymization and De-Identification in the Biomedical Literature: Scoping Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  S. Eriksson,et al.  Biobank research: who benefits from individual consent? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Medical Image Data and Datasets in the Era of Machine Learning—Whitepaper from the 2016 C-MIMI Meeting Dataset Session , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  Steven N Goodman,et al.  An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. , 2013, The Hastings Center report.

[11]  Nabile M. Safdar,et al.  Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. , 2019, Radiology.

[12]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. , 2010, Health services research.

[13]  Bartha Maria Knoppers,et al.  Ethics and Big Data in health , 2017 .