Purpose: To date, critical success factors for design and implementing knowledge management system in a multi-case study research have not been systematically investigated. Most of existing studies have derived their critical success factors from single company perspectives and have not considered all factors in an integrated way in a multi-case study research. This paper is aimed to bridge this gap.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study technique has been used in this paper for data collection to gain insights into the topic being investigated. For that, 'grounded theory' research approach has been selected by which the collected data from real case studies (successful organizations in KM adoption) are categorized and analyzed through specific stages. The extracted concepts can demonstrate critical success factors of knowledge management system within organizations.Findings: The overall results from the real case studies were positive, thus reflecting the appropriateness of the proposed critical success factors. Also 16 concepts and a conceptual framework are the other findings of this research that clarify how to design and implement a knowledge management system in an organization. The conceptual framework presents a road map for success of KM programs in the organizations. Practical implications: The set of critical success factors can act as a list of items for organizations to address when adopting knowledge management. This helps to ensure that the essential issues and factors are covered during design and implementation phase. For academics, it provides a common language for them to discuss and study the factors crucial for the success of knowledge management program in an organization.Originality/value: This study is probably the first to provide an integrated perspective of critical success factors for implementing KM through a multi-case study research. It gives valuable information and guidelines which hopefully will help the leaders to accomplish knowledge management through their organizations in an effective way.
[1]
A. Strauss,et al.
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
,
1967
.
[2]
N. Denzin,et al.
Handbook of Qualitative Research
,
1994
.
[3]
Vtt Publications,et al.
Knowledge Management Process Model
,
2001
.
[4]
A. Strauss,et al.
Grounded theory
,
2017
.
[5]
Ronald Maier,et al.
Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies
,
2002
.
[6]
Peter J. Cook,et al.
I heard it through the grapevine: making knowledge management work by learning to share knowledge, skills and experience
,
1999
.
[7]
Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.
Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital
,
2000
.
[8]
Alan D. Smith,et al.
Knowledge management strategies: a multi-case study
,
2004,
J. Knowl. Manag..
[9]
Karen Locke.
Grounded Theory in Management Research
,
2000
.
[10]
Catherine C. Marshall,et al.
Designing Qualitative Research
,
1996
.
[11]
Thomas H. Davenport,et al.
Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6
,
1998
.
[12]
J. Liebowitz.
Key ingredients to the success of an organization's knowledge management strategy
,
1999
.
[13]
Michael H. Zack,et al.
Developing a Knowledge Strategy
,
1999
.