Mitigation of fire damage and escalation by fireproofing: A risk-based strategy

Passive fire protection by the application of fireproofing materials is a crucial safety barrier in the prevention of the escalation of fire scenarios. Fireproofing improves the capacity of process items and of support structures to maintain their structural integrity during a fire, preventing or at least delaying the collapse of structural elements. Maintenance and cost issues require, however, to apply such protection only where an actual risk of severe fire scenarios is present. Available methodologies for fireproofing application in on-shore installation do not consider the effect of jet-fires. In the present study, a risk-based methodology aimed at the protection from both pool fire and jet fire escalation was developed. The procedure addresses both the prevention of domino effect and the mitigation of asset damage due to the primary fire scenario. The method is mainly oriented to early design application, allowing the identification of fireproofing zones in the initial phases of lay-out definition.

[1]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Inherent safety key performance indicators for hydrogen storage systems. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries , 2001 .

[5]  Gary F. Bennett,et al.  The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering : By P.J. DiNenno, C.L. Beyler, R.L.P. Custer, W.D. Walton and J.M. Watts, Jr., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA and Society of Fire Prot , 1990 .

[6]  John Spouge New generic leak frequencies for process equipment , 2005 .

[7]  Pang-An Hsiao,et al.  Vector Form Intrinsic Finite Element analysis of nonlinear behavior of steel structures exposed to fire , 2010 .

[8]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Identification of fireproofing zones in Oil&Gas facilities by a risk-based procedure. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Shahid Abbas Abbasi,et al.  The world's worst industrial accident of the 1990s what happened and what might have been: A quantitative study , 1999 .

[10]  J Casal,et al.  Using transportation accident databases to investigate ignition and explosion probabilities of flammable spills. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Modeling the performance of coated LPG tanks engulfed in fires. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  L. K. Tang,et al.  Advanced analysis for the assessment of steel frames in fire , 1998 .

[13]  Faisal Khan,et al.  How to make inherent safety practice a reality , 2008 .

[14]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[16]  K. Seshaiah,et al.  Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events , 2006 .

[17]  C.J.H. van den Bosch,et al.  Methods for the calculation of physical effects – ‘Yellow Book,’ CPR 14E , 1997 .

[18]  John Thomas Marshall,et al.  Dow's chemical exposure index guide , 1995 .

[19]  Trevor Kletz Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 3rd edition, M.S. Mannan (Ed.). Butterworth Heinemann (2005), 3680 pp, £425, ISBN 0 75067 555 1 , 2005 .

[20]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Generic nonlinear modelling of restrained steel beams at elevated temperatures , 2009 .

[21]  Christian Delvosalle,et al.  ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A consequence based approach to the quantitative assessment of inherent safety , 2007 .

[23]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making , 2004 .

[24]  Torgeir Moan Development of accidental collapse limit state criteria for offshore structures , 2009 .

[25]  Ccps Guidelines for Fire Protection in Chemical, Petrochemical, and Hydrocarbon Processing Facilities , 2003 .

[26]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  D. G. Clark,et al.  Inherently Safer Chemical Processes: A Life Cycle Approach , 1997 .

[29]  Ccps Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[30]  Trevor Kletz Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design , 1998 .

[31]  Alexandre Landesmann,et al.  Implementation of advanced analysis method for steel-framed structures under fire conditions , 2005 .