Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural–urban fringe

Rapid growth at the rural–urban fringe has resulted in increased commercial development along arterial roads connecting cities and the countryside. These developments, often termed “commercial strips” or “linear commercial complexes”, are characterized by a mix of many different types of businesses that often lack any separation from the road, spatial definition, or natural features such as trees. The result is too often an open, barren, confusing setting with little aesthetic appeal. Could a change in the design of the commercial setting or the addition of natural features improve the visual quality of the roadway at the rural–urban fringe? This study examines the extent to which local citizens prefer various development patterns for a roadway corridor at the fringe of a medium-sized community. Participants responded to a photo-questionnaire that included images of alternative design treatments for the roadside and written items dealing with visual quality. The results revealed moderate preference for the existing condition that showed a typical Midwestern US agricultural setting. The addition of various types of commercial development to the settings caused preference ratings to plummet. However, the addition of trees to the commercial development scenes increased preference ratings substantially. In fact, this low cost alteration in the design not only caused preference ratings to rebound, but actually exceed the ratings for the existing condition. Ratings were higher still for scenes in which trees were added to the existing condition. The findings suggest that nature plays an important role in the aesthetics of developed settings at the rural–urban fringe, and that trees in particular can be used to improve visual quality. This study has implications for the design of roadways and commercial developments at the fringe. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Kathleen L Wolf.  Freeway Roadside Management: The Urban Forest Beyond the White Line , 2003, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[2]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Environment and Crime in the Inner City , 2001 .

[3]  Wayne K.D. Davies,et al.  Commercial intensification: the transformation of a highway-orientated ribbon , 1997 .

[4]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[5]  R. Brush,et al.  Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes , 2000 .

[6]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  VIEWS OF NATURE AND SELF-DISCIPLINE: EVIDENCE FROM INNER CITY CHILDREN , 2002 .

[7]  S. Lovell,et al.  Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: An examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States , 2004 .

[8]  Paul Edwards,et al.  Working From Home: Everything You Need to Know About Living and Working Under the Same Roof , 1985 .

[9]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Coping with add , 2001 .

[10]  R. Kaplan.  The Nature of the View from Home , 2001 .

[11]  T. Daniels.  When City and Country Collide: Managing Growth In The Metropolitan Fringe , 1998 .

[12]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[13]  John W. Keller,et al.  Rural Planning and Development in the United States , 1989 .

[14]  G. Evans,et al.  Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences , 1991 .

[15]  Tridib Banerjee,et al.  CITY SENSE AND CITY DESIGN: WRITINGS AND PROJECTS OF KEVIN LYNCH , 1990, Landscape Journal.

[16]  William C. Sullivan,et al.  Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings , 1994 .

[17]  M. Francis,et al.  The Meaning of Gardens: Idea, Place, and Action , 1990 .

[18]  Ouis,et al.  THE VIEW FROM THE ROAD : IMPLICATIONS FOR STRESS RECOVERY AND IMMUNIZATION , 1998 .

[19]  Kathleen L. Wolf,et al.  PUBLIC RESPONSE TO THE URBAN FOREST IN INNER-CITY BUSINESS DISTRICTS , 2003 .

[20]  Richard L. Kent,et al.  Scenic routes linking and protecting natural and cultural landscape features : a greenway skeleton , 1995 .

[21]  M. Hebl,et al.  THE VIEW FROM THE ROAD: IMPLICATIONS FOR STRESS RECOVERY AND IMMUNIZATION , 1998 .

[22]  Harvey K. Flad.  Country Clutter: Visual Pollution and the Rural Roadscape , 1997 .

[23]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework , 1995 .

[24]  David L Ronis,et al.  An Environmental Intervention to Restore Attention in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer , 2003, Cancer nursing.

[25]  M. E. Myers.  One View from the Road Where is the leading edge of highway aesthetics to be found? A critical review of a recent road inventory in Michigan , 2002 .

[26]  R. Ulrich.  View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[27]  M. Friedberger.  The Rural-Urban Fringe in the Late Twentieth Century , 2000, Agricultural History.

[28]  Gary W. Evans,et al.  Assessment of Environmental Aesthetics in Scenic Highway Corridors , 1980 .

[29]  Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data , 1991 .

[30]  H. Frumkin.  Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  V. Clulow,et al.  Retail concentration: a comparison of spatial convenience in shopping strips and shopping centres , 2004 .

[32]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Aggression and Violence in the Inner City , 2001 .

[33]  Russ Parsons.  The potential influences of environmental perception on human health , 1991 .

[34]  R. D. Young,et al.  Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study , 2002 .

[35]  Terry C. Daniel,et al.  Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. , 2000 .