Fear‐then‐relief, mindlessness, and cognitive deficits

The assumption that mindlessness underlies the effectiveness of the ‘fear-then-relief’ social influence technique has been verified in four studies. The first two experiments indicated that compliance of those experiment participants who were made to function on the thoughtful level under a ‘fear-thenrelief’ condition decreases to the level observed in the control group. The other two experiments were to analyze the cognitive functioning of people who at first experience fear and then a sudden and unexpected relief. The first of these experiments indicated that the amount of time needed to detect the expression of emotion on other persons’ faces is prolonged, and the second of these latter two experiments that the participants’ arithmetical abilities are impaired (mental addition and subtraction of three two-digit numbers). Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The fear-then-relief scene already belongs to the canon of action cinema and literature: two policemen run an interrogation; the first is very severe—usually older, he yells at the suspect and sometimes even beats him or her. Then suddenly the other policeman—a friendly man, who proposes coffee and a cigarette, and thinking aloud how to help the suspect, takes his place. Very often under these new unexpected circumstances, the suspect—so far obstinately refusing any form of cooperation—starts to confess everything, implicating not only himself or herself but even his or her companions. Dolinski and Nawrat (1998) assumed that the above ‘good cop–bad cop’ scenario is only an exemplification of a general rule, and is not just a specific phenomenon connected uniquely with police interrogation. They set forth the hypothesis that a sudden retraction of the external sources of fear leads to people’s increased compliance with various requests, suggestions, and commands. They demonstrated, for instance, that requests to fill in a questionnaire or to make a charity donation were fulfilled much more willingly by people who had just heard the sound of a police whistle while crossing the road in a place not intended for that purpose, and after having turned their eyes in the direction of the sound suddenly realized that somebody (not a policeman) was just playing a joke.

[1]  A. Schiffenbauer,et al.  Effect of observer's emotional state on judgments of the emotional state of others. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  M. Denny Fear, avoidance, and phobias : a fundamental analysis , 1991 .

[3]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[4]  D. Perkins,et al.  Life in the Mindful Classroom: Nurturing the Disposition of Mindfulness , 2000 .

[5]  J. Harvey Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1981 .

[6]  Antony Stephen Reid Manstead,et al.  Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions , 1986 .

[7]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion , 2000 .

[8]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  E. Langer,et al.  The Mindlessness of Ostensibly Thoughtful Action: The Role of "Placebic" Information in Interpersonal Interaction , 1978 .

[10]  D. Doliński,et al.  “Fear-Then-Relief” Procedure for Producing Compliance: Beware When the Danger Is Over , 1998 .

[11]  R. Solomon The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: the costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain. , 1980, The American psychologist.

[12]  J. Suls,et al.  Helping, Self-Attribution, and the Size of an Initial Request , 1977 .

[13]  G. Johar,et al.  Contingent Effects of Anxiety on Message Elaboration and Persuasion , 2001 .

[14]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[15]  Judith A. Hall Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[16]  Francis T. McAndrew,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Recognition Thresholds for Facial Expressions of Emotion , 1986 .

[17]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect and cognition: The hard interface. , 1985 .

[19]  J. Maser,et al.  Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders , 2019 .

[20]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[21]  Silvan S. Tomkins,et al.  The negative affects : anger and fear , 1991 .

[22]  C. Batson The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[23]  J. Norem,et al.  Strategy-dependent effects of reflecting on self and tasks: Some implications of optimism and defensive pessimism. , 1993 .

[24]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events , 1989 .

[25]  U. Hess,et al.  The Intensity of Emotional Facial Expressions and Decoding Accuracy , 1997 .

[26]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[27]  E. Langer,et al.  The prevention of mindlessness. , 1987 .

[28]  R. Baron Arousal, Capacity, and Intense Indoctrination , 2000 .

[29]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[31]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[33]  D. Massaro,et al.  Featural evaluation, integration, and judgment of facial affect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  K. Kaplan,et al.  Does a “Foot-in-the-Door” Get You in or out? , 1974 .

[35]  P. Ekman Emotion in the human face , 1982 .

[36]  N. Feshbach,et al.  Influence of the stimulus object upon the complementary and supplementary projection of fear. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[37]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .