The impact of subliminal haptic perception on the preference discrimination of roughness and compliance

It is well known that unaware exposure to a visual stimulus increases the preferability of the associated object. In this study we examine whether the same phenomena occur for haptic stimuli. Using a touch-enabled virtual environment, we tested whether people that touch two virtual surfaces, which differ by imperceptible differences in roughness or compliance, tend to choose rougher or smoother, softer or stiffer surfaces, in accordance with their natural tendency. In forced choice preference tests, participants were first asked to choose between two surfaces that differ by roughness/stiffness. Stimuli strength was above the aware perception limit. Then, the same test was performed for differences in stimuli strength, which was below the limit of awareness. Finally, we carried out a recognition test: participants were asked to choose between the surfaces presented in the previous step, and point at the smoother or softer surface, respectively. For each stimulus, two groups of 26 subjects participated. Results show that in the unaware preference tests, participants selected the surface in accordance with the aware preference tests, with significant difference from chance (59.5%, and 60.2% for roughness and compliance as a stimulus, respectively). The recognition tests in both experiments were at chance level, suggesting that participants were unaware of the difference in stimuli. These results show that subliminal perception of roughness and compliance strength affects texture preferences. Research data suggest that the amygdala is central in regulating emotional processing of visual stimuli, even if it is presented subliminally. Thus, the results of this study raise the question whether the amygdala also modulates emotional haptic stimuli when they are subliminally perceived.

[1]  Johan Wessberg,et al.  Discriminative touch and emotional touch. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[2]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[3]  J. Gyoba,et al.  Visual and tactile cross-modal mere exposure effects , 2008 .

[4]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  Haptic behavior in social interaction , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas J. Ross,et al.  Amygdala response to both positively and negatively valenced stimuli , 2001, Neuroreport.

[6]  Marcos Hilsenrat,et al.  The impact of unaware perception on bodily interaction in virtual reality environments , 2009 .

[7]  G. Clore,et al.  On the interdependence of cognition and emotion , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[8]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Semantic Processing Precedes Affect Retrieval: The Neurological Case for Cognitive Primacy in Visual Processing , 2006 .

[9]  F. Bellisle,et al.  The measurement of food preferences in humans: Do taste-and-spit tests predict consumption? , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple , 1990, Cognition.

[11]  R. Adolphs Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[12]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[13]  E. Rolls,et al.  The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[14]  T. Ono,et al.  Amygdalar and hippocampal neuron responses related to recognition and memory in monkey. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[15]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .

[16]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. , 2000 .

[17]  Soledad Ballesteros,et al.  Visual and Haptic Discrimination of Symmetry in Unfamiliar Displays Extended in the z-Axis , 2004, Perception.

[18]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[19]  E. Rolls Memory, Attention, and Decision-Making: A unifying computational neuroscience approach , 2007 .

[20]  Joseph E LeDoux The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1996 .

[21]  A. Little,et al.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[23]  Karine Sergerie,et al.  The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  G. Di Chiara,et al.  Cocaine and Amphetamine Increase Extracellular Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens of Mice Lacking the Dopamine Transporter Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Reingold,et al.  Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  M. Beauregard,et al.  Neural Correlates of Conscious Self-Regulation of Emotion , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Dolan,et al.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala , 1998, Nature.

[28]  Elaine P. Gelineau A Psychometric Approach to the Measurement of Color Preference , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  C. Landini Subliminal perception and music : a brief survey , 2003 .

[30]  S. Rauch,et al.  Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  E T Rolls,et al.  Representations of pleasant and painful touch in the human orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  G. Ekman,et al.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Brain structures activated by overt and covert emotional visual stimuli , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[34]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Impact of signal-to-noise on functional MRI of the human amygdala , 2001, Neuroreport.

[35]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation , 2008, CHI.

[36]  G. Ekman,et al.  Saltness, sweetness, and preference. A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. , 1965, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[37]  D. Zald The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[38]  Brian Henson,et al.  Materials’ tactile testing and characterisation for consumer products’ affective packaging design , 2009 .

[39]  John A. Groeger,et al.  Qualitatively Different Effects of Undetected and Unidentified Auditory Primes , 1988 .

[40]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[41]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Differential extrageniculostriate and amygdala responses to presentation of emotional faces in a cortically blind field. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Harold J. McWhinnie,et al.  A review of research on aesthetic measure , 1968 .

[43]  M. Milinski,et al.  Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans. , 2001 .