Decoupling of a double‐row 16‐element tight‐fit transceiver phased array for human whole‐brain imaging at 9.4 T

One of the major challenges in constructing multi‐channel and multi‐row transmit (Tx) or transceiver (TxRx) arrays is the decoupling of the array's loop elements. Overlapping of the surface loops allows the decoupling of adjacent elements and also helps to improve the radiofrequency field profile by increasing the penetration depth and eliminating voids between the loops. This also simplifies the design by reducing the number of decoupling circuits. At the same time, overlapping may compromise decoupling by generating high resistive (electric) coupling near the overlap, which cannot be compensated for by common decoupling techniques. Previously, based on analytical modeling, we demonstrated that electric coupling has strong frequency and loading dependence, and, at 9.4 T, both the magnetic and electric coupling between two heavily loaded loops can be compensated at the same time simply by overlapping the loops. As a result, excellent decoupling was obtained between adjacent loops of an eight‐loop single‐row (1 × 8) human head tight‐fit TxRx array. In this work, we designed and constructed a 9.4‐T (400‐MHz) 16‐loop double‐row (2 × 8) overlapped TxRx head array based on the results of the analytical and numerical electromagnetic modeling. We demonstrated that, simply by the optimal overlap of array loops, a very good decoupling can be obtained without additional decoupling strategies. The constructed TxRx array provides whole‐brain coverage and approximately 1.5 times greater Tx efficiency relative to a transmit‐only/receive‐only (ToRo) array, which consists of a larger Tx‐only array and a nested tight‐fit 31‐loop receive (Rx)‐only array. At the same time, the ToRo array provides greater peripheral signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and better Rx parallel performance in the head–feet direction. Overall, our work provides a recipe for a simple, robust and very Tx‐efficient design suitable for parallel transmission and whole‐brain imaging at ultra‐high fields.

[1]  B. Beck,et al.  Tissue‐equivalent phantoms for high frequencies , 2004 .

[2]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  M. Chodorow,et al.  Handbook of Microwave Measurements. , 1964, Science.

[4]  Robert Turner,et al.  Analysis of RF transmit performance for a multi-row multi-channel MRI loop array at 300 and 400 MHz , 2011, Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2011.

[5]  Paul A Bottomley,et al.  Noise figure limits for circular loop MR coils , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  An eight‐channel, nonoverlapping phased array coil with capacitive decoupling for parallel MRI at 3 T , 2007 .

[7]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Eichmann,et al.  Active digital decoupling for multi-channel transmit MRI Systems , 2007 .

[9]  Vasily L Yarnykh,et al.  Actual flip‐angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three‐dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Nikolai I Avdievich,et al.  Transceiver-Phased Arrays for Human Brain Studies at 7 T , 2011, Applied magnetic resonance.

[11]  Peter Andersen,et al.  9.4T human MRI: Preliminary results , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Alsop,et al.  A spiral volume coil for improved RF field homogeneity at high static magnetic field strength , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Safety testing and operational procedures for self‐developed radiofrequency coils , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  A 16‐channel dual‐row transmit array in combination with a 31‐element receive array for human brain imaging at 9.4 T , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Mojgan Daneshmand,et al.  Experimental verification of SNR and parallel imaging improvements using composite arrays , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Yudong Zhu,et al.  Parallel excitation with an array of transmit coils , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Ravi S Menon,et al.  Transceive surface coil array for magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 4 T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  A Pfrommer,et al.  Combination of surface and ‘vertical’ loop elements improves receive performance of a human head transceiver array at 9.4 T , 2018, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  Steen Moeller,et al.  A 32‐channel lattice transmission line array for parallel transmit and receive MRI at 7 tesla , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. Kaul,et al.  Microwave engineering , 1989, IEEE Potentials.

[21]  Steven M. Wright,et al.  Full‐wave analysis of planar radiofrequency coils and coil arrays with assumed current distribution , 2002 .

[22]  Patrick McDaniel,et al.  General design approach and practical realization of decoupling matrices for parallel transmission coils , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Numerical and experimental evaluation of RF shimming in the human brain at 9.4 T using a dual-row transmit array , 2014, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[25]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  A conformal transceive array for 7 T neuroimaging , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  P. Börnert,et al.  Transmit SENSE , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Anke Henning,et al.  Effect of the RF Shield on the Mutual Coupling Between Adjacent and Non-Adjacent Array Elements , 2016 .

[28]  Anke Henning,et al.  Novel splittable N‐Tx/2N‐Rx transceiver phased array to optimize both signal‐to‐noise ratio and transmit efficiency at 9.4T , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Steen Moeller,et al.  A geometrically adjustable 16‐channel transmit/receive transmission line array for improved RF efficiency and parallel imaging performance at 7 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMR , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Anke Henning,et al.  Decoupling of a tight‐fit transceiver phased array for human brain imaging at 9.4T: Loop overlapping rediscovered , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  M D Harpen Radiative losses of a birdcage resonator , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  A transmit‐only/receive‐only (TORO) RF system for high‐field MRI/MRS applications , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  K Scheffler,et al.  Evaluation of transmit efficiency and SAR for a tight fit transceiver human head phased array at 9.4 T , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[35]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  L. Wald,et al.  Eight‐channel phased array coil and detunable TEM volume coil for 7 T brain imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  R. Menon,et al.  Analysis of circumferential shielding as a methodto decouple radiofrequency coils for high‐field MRI , 2013 .

[38]  Hoby P Hetherington,et al.  Resonant inductive decoupling (RID) for transceiver arrays to compensate for both reactive and resistive components of the mutual impedance , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[39]  A. Henning,et al.  Analytical modeling provides new insight into complex mutual coupling between surface loops at ultrahigh fields , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[40]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.