Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia basin example

Integrating management actions to consistently achieve broad ecological and socioeconomic goals is a challenge largely unmet. The presumed or real conflict between these goals establishes a forum for debate. Broad measures are needed to describe tradeoffs, trends in conditions under varying management scenarios, and a transparent science underpinning. The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project in the northwestern United States provides a useful example where scientists, managers, and the public have explored these issues in depth. From a science perspective we conclude that a successful strategy for broad-scale land management will need the ability to do the following: maintain long-term sustainability of resources and ecosystems; maintain socioeconomic resiliency; continually assess results of management activities; manage risks and opportunities through consistent approaches at multiple scales; expand our knowledge base; and adaptively manage for new knowledge and assessments of resource conditions/capabilities.

[1]  Danilo Palazzo,et al.  Ecological Stewardship. A Common Reference for Ecosystem Management , 2000 .

[2]  Phedon Nicolaides,et al.  Hard heads, soft hearts , 1989 .

[3]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  Estimating ecological integrity in the interior Columbia River basin , 2001 .

[4]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. , 1996 .

[5]  S. Levin,et al.  Biological research priorities—a sustainable biosphere , 1991 .

[6]  N. Johnson,et al.  Ecological stewardship : a common reference for ecosystem management , 1999 .

[7]  J. M. Henderson,et al.  Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. , 1959 .

[8]  佐藤 大七郎,et al.  Forest Ecology and Management , 1999 .

[9]  C. Sasser Ecological Indicators for the Nation , 2009 .

[10]  K. Johnson,et al.  Bioregional assessments : science at the crossroads of management and policy , 1999 .

[11]  Rebecca A. Gravenmier,et al.  Science and ecosystem management in the interior Columbia basin. , 2001 .

[12]  Miles A. Hemstrom,et al.  Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basin , 2001 .

[13]  Benjamin B. Stout Forest Resource Economics , 1974 .

[14]  Jay M. Huches Forest Resource Economics , 1977 .

[15]  Robert T. Lackey,et al.  Radically contested assertions in ecosystem management. , 1999 .

[16]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT IN THE INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN , 1996 .

[17]  Thomas M. Quigley,et al.  An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: volume 1. , 1997 .

[18]  Rebecca A. Gravenmier,et al.  Costs and effectiveness of multi-scale integrated management , 2001 .

[19]  James T. Peterson,et al.  Evaluation of potential effects of federal land management alternatives on trends of salmonids and their habitats in the interior Columbia River basin , 2001 .

[20]  Virginia H. Dale,et al.  Sustaining the people’s lands:recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century , 1999 .

[21]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Status and trends of habitats of terrestrial vertebrates in relation to land management in the interior Columbia river basin , 2001 .