Reclaiming thinking : dialectic , dialogic and learning in the digital age

This paper examines and reflects on a selection of approaches to technology enhanced learning that focus on the promotion of contemporary interactions and thinking. These processes and practices are articulated in terms of dialectic and dialogic dimensions of learning dialogue. We hold that these dialectic and dialogic processes (interpreted broadly) are a primary 'engine' for stimulating and supporting the collaborative development of knowledge, meaning and understanding in ways that promote deep learning in most educational contexts. The argument presented in this article includes reviews of the authors' previous work which encompasses philosophical foundations, sociocultural psychology, empirical studies and design-based research methods. After presenting related perspectives and examples that substantiate our 'dialectical and dialogical stance', we will summarise the implications for designing interactions that stimulate thinking, conceptual development and engaging learning. One major implication is that we need to improve our theorising about the key features of the anatomy of effective and meaningful learning interaction and dialogue.

[1]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Designing argumentation for conceptual development , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Rupert Wegerif,et al.  Reason and Creativity in Classroom Dialogues , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  William O’Neill,et al.  Computer-Mediated Zones of Engagement in Learning , 1993 .

[6]  Alfred Bork Tutorial Learning for the New Century , 2001 .

[7]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Designing interaction as a dialogue game : Linking social and conceptual dimensions of the learning process , 2006 .

[9]  Christine Parker-Jones,et al.  Can Concept Maps Support Medical Students Learning From Simulation , 2007 .

[10]  C. Hoadley Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research , 2004 .

[11]  John Williams,et al.  语言与理解 = Language and understanding , 1994 .

[12]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  Investigation by Design: Developing Dialogue Models to Support Reasoning and Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[13]  G. Hegel,et al.  The Logic of Hegel , 2009 .

[14]  Andrew Ravenscroft Learning as knowledge refinement : a computer based approach , 1997 .

[15]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[16]  Rupert Wegerif Two Images of Reason in Educational Theory. , 1998 .

[17]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[18]  R. Wegerif Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue , 2008 .

[19]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  Interacting with computer-based simulation: The role of dialogue , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[21]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .

[22]  Roger Hartley An interactive computer-based simulation environment for supporting and developing complex decision-making skills , 2003 .

[23]  Roger Hartley,et al.  CACTUS: Command and control training using knowledge-based simulations , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[24]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Tom Boyle,et al.  A Dynamic, Systematic Method for Developing Blended Learning , 2005 .

[26]  R. C. Macridis A review , 1963 .

[27]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction , 2004 .

[28]  J. R. Hartley Qualitative Reasoning and Conceptual Change: Computer Based Support in Understanding Science , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[29]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Digital Games and Learning in Cyberspace: A Dialogical Approach , 2006 .