A novel approach to the detection of acromegaly: accuracy of diagnosis by automatic face classification.

CONTEXT The delay between onset of first symptoms and diagnosis of the acromegaly is 6-10 yr. Acromegaly causes typical changes of the face that might be recognized by face classification software. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess classification accuracy of acromegaly by face-classification software. DESIGN This was a diagnostic study. SETTING The study was conducted in specialized care. PARTICIPANTS Participants in the study included 57 patients with acromegaly (29 women, 28 men) and 60 sex- and age-matched controls. INTERVENTIONS We took frontal and side photographs of the faces and grouped patients into subjects with mild, moderate, and severe facial features of acromegaly by overall impression. We then analyzed all pictures using computerized similarity analysis based on Gabor jets and geometry functions. We used the leave-one-out cross-validation method to classify subjects by the software. Additionally, all subjects were classified by visual impression by three acromegaly experts and three general internists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Classification accuracy by software, experts, and internists was measured. FINDINGS The software correctly classified 71.9% of patients and 91.5% of controls. Classification accuracy for patients by visual analysis was 63.2 and 42.1% by experts and general internists, respectively. Classification accuracy for controls was 80.8 and 87.0% by experts and internists, respectively. The highest differences in accuracy between software and experts and internists were present for patients with mild acromegaly. CONCLUSIONS Acromegaly can be detected by computer software using photographs of the face. Classification accuracy by software is higher than by medical experts or general internists, particularly in patients with mild features of acromegaly. This is a promising tool to help detecting acromegaly.

[1]  P. Chanson,et al.  Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update. , 2009, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  S. Melmed Medical progress: Acromegaly. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jeffrey N Bruce,et al.  Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under‐recognized and under‐diagnosed , 2010, Clinical endocrinology.

[4]  H. Wittchen,et al.  High prevalence of biochemical acromegaly in primary care patients with elevated IGF‐1 levels , 2008, Clinical endocrinology.

[5]  Qifeng Lu,et al.  Detecting Acromegaly: Screening for Disease with a Morphable Model , 2006, MICCAI.

[6]  Tobias Vollmar,et al.  Syndrome identification based on 2D analysis software , 2006, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[7]  A. Barkan Acromegaly , 1890, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[8]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  Computer-based recognition of dysmorphic faces , 2003, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[9]  P. Chanson,et al.  A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. , 2010, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  Rolf P. Würtz,et al.  Face Detection and Recognition Using Maximum Likelihood Classifiers on Gabor Graphs , 2009, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Tobias Vollmar,et al.  Impact of geometry and viewing angle on classification accuracy of 2D based analysis of dysmorphic faces. , 2008, European journal of medical genetics.

[12]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.