Importance of crustal corrections in the development of a new global model of radial anisotropy

[1] Accurately inferring the radially anisotropic structure of the mantle using seismic waveforms requires correcting for the effects of crustal structure on waveforms. Recent studies have quantified the importance of accurate crustal corrections when mapping upper mantle structure using surface waves and overtones. Here, we explore the effects of crustal corrections on the retrieval of deep mantle velocity and radial anisotropy structure. We apply a new method of nonlinear crustal corrections to a three-component surface and body waveform data set and invert for a suite of models of radially anisotropic shear velocity. We then compare the retrieved models against each other and a model derived from an identical data set but using a different nonlinear crustal correction scheme. While retrieval of isotropic structure in the deep mantle appears to be robust with respect to changes in crustal corrections, we find large differences in anisotropic structure that result from the use of different crustal corrections, particularly at transition zone and greater depths. Furthermore, anisotropic structure in the lower mantle, including the depth-averaged signature in the core-mantle boundary region, appears to be quite sensitive to choices of crustal correction. Our new preferred model, SAW642ANb, shows improvement in data fit and reduction in apparent crustal artifacts. We argue that the accuracy of crustal corrections may currently be a limiting factor for improved resolution and agreement between models of mantle anisotropy.

[1]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Finite-frequency sensitivity of surface waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods , 2007 .

[2]  G. Nolet,et al.  Surface wave tomography for azimuthal anisotropy in a strongly reduced parameter space , 2008 .

[3]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory , 1996 .

[4]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  The effects of the theoretical formalism and data selection on mantle models derived from waveform tomography , 1999 .

[5]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  J. Tromp,et al.  Finite‐frequency sensitivity of body waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods , 2007 .

[7]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Finite-Frequency Tomography Reveals a Variety of Plumes in the Mantle , 2004, Science.

[8]  Philip Skemer,et al.  Geodynamic Significance of Seismic Anisotropy of the Upper Mantle: New Insights from Laboratory Studies , 2008 .

[9]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  The three‐dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher‐mode waveforms , 2000 .

[10]  G. Nolet,et al.  Global upper‐mantle structure from finite‐frequency surface‐wave tomography , 2004 .

[11]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling , 1995 .

[12]  Joseph S. Resovsky,et al.  The signal of mantle anisotropy in the coupling of normal modes , 2008 .

[13]  Qinya Liu,et al.  Tomography, Adjoint Methods, Time-Reversal, and Banana-Doughnut Kernels , 2004 .

[14]  J. Trampert,et al.  On the robustness of global radially anisotropic surface wave tomography , 2010 .

[15]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Nonlinear Crustal Corrections for Normal-Mode Seismograms , 2007 .

[16]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  On the computation of long period seismograms in a 3-D earth using normal mode based approximations , 2008 .

[17]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Whole Earth tomography from delay times of P, PcP, and PKP phases: Lateral heterogeneities in the outer core or radial anisotropy in the mantle? , 2000 .

[18]  P. Shearer,et al.  Shear and compressional velocity models of the mantle from cluster analysis of long‐period waveforms , 2008 .

[19]  J. Trampert,et al.  Probability density functions for radial anisotropy: implications for the upper 1200 km of the mantle , 2004 .

[20]  E. Bozdağ,et al.  On crustal corrections in surface wave tomography , 2008 .

[21]  T. Becker,et al.  Radial seismic anisotropy as a constraint for upper mantle rheology , 2007 .

[22]  Hendrik Jan van Heijst,et al.  Global transition zone tomography , 2004 .

[23]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Spherical-spline parameterization of three-dimensional Earth models , 1995 .

[24]  C. Beghein.  Radial anisotropy and prior petrological constraints: A comparative study , 2010 .

[25]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Inferences on Flow at the Base of Earth's Mantle Based on Seismic Anisotropy , 2004, Science.

[26]  F. Marone,et al.  Non-linear crustal corrections in high-resolution regional waveform seismic tomography , 2007 .

[27]  R. Hilst,et al.  Constraining P-wave velocity variations in the upper mantle beneath Southeast Asia , 2006 .

[28]  N. Ribe,et al.  A kinematic model for recrystallization and texture development in olivine polycrystals , 2001 .

[29]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Anisotropic shear‐wave velocity structure of the Earth's mantle: A global model , 2008 .

[30]  J. Trampert,et al.  Probability density functions for radial anisotropy from fundamental mode surface wave data and the Neighbourhood Algorithm , 2004 .

[31]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Fully nonlinear inversion of fundamental mode surface waves for a global crustal model , 2007 .

[32]  H. Nataf,et al.  Vectorial tomography—I. Theory , 1988 .

[33]  Guust Nolet,et al.  A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite‐frequency tomography , 2006 .

[34]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[35]  Jeffrey Park.  The sensitivity of seismic free oscillations to upper mantle anisotropy 1. Zonal symmetry , 1993 .

[36]  J. Montagner,et al.  Vectorial tomography—II. Application to the Indian Ocean , 1988 .

[37]  C. Bassin,et al.  The Current Limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America , 2000 .

[38]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Radially-Anisotropic Model of Shear Velocity in the Whole Mantle , 2006 .

[39]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Seismic waveform modelling in a 3-D Earth using the Born approximation: Potential shortcomings and a remedy , 2009 .

[40]  L. Boschi,et al.  New images of the Earth's upper mantle from measurements of surface wave phase velocity anomalies , 2002 .

[41]  N. Simmons,et al.  Joint seismic, geodynamic and mineral physical constraints on three-dimensional mantle heterogeneity: Implications for the relative importance of thermal versus compositional heterogeneity , 2009 .

[42]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  A simple method for improving crustal corrections in waveform tomography , 2010 .

[43]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Simultaneous inversion for mantle shear velocity and topography of transition zone discontinuities , 2001 .

[44]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Global anisotropy and the thickness of continents , 2003, Nature.