GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE

Objectives: To identify major differences and similarities in the development of clinical guidelines in different European countries. Methods: A collaboration of researchers is funded by the European Commission to compare the approaches to guideline development in collaborators' countries. The program encompasses a series of tasks, the first being to identify and document current guideline procedures in the collaborating countries. A survey gathered information on guideline production, dissemination, and implementation in the 10 European countries involved in the project consortium: Denmark, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Scotland, Spain (both the Basque Country and Catalonia), and Switzerland. Results: Seven countries have a national policy on guideline production, dissemination, and implementation, and three countries are discussing their policies. A majority of guidelines are currently produced at the national level in six of the countries and at the regional or local level in the other four. Central or national funding supports guideline production in six countries. Additional sources of funding include medical societies, pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies. Several of the countries have published or are preparing evaluations of their dissemination strategies. Conclusions: The survey highlighted wide variation in the methods and policies of guideline development in Europe. The Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) Collaboration research program will identify the characteristics of the “better” guideline programs and will provide the basis for more research-generated policy initiatives in the future, helping to ensure that guidelines play a major role in improving patient care in the millennium.

[1]  M. Mayo-Smith,et al.  Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. , 1999, JAMA.

[2]  R. Grol,et al.  Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from The Netherlands. , 1995, The Journal of family practice.

[3]  A Helou,et al.  [Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a systemic assessment of guidelines presented on the Internet]. , 1998, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung.

[4]  P. Bowie,et al.  Getting a Validated Guideline into Local Practice: Implementation and Audit of the Sign Guideline on the Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in a District General Hospital , 1998, Scottish medical journal.

[5]  B. Fervers,et al.  Impact of a clinical guidelines program for breast and colon cancer in a French cancer center. , 1997, JAMA.

[6]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews. , 1988, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[7]  T. Fahey,et al.  Clinical guidelines and the management of hypertension: a between-practice and guideline comparison. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  I. Kunnamo,et al.  Physicians' Patterns of Using a Computerized Collection of Guidelines for Primary Care , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  M. Rawlins In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  G. Ollenschläger,et al.  [The guideline clearing programme of the self-governmental bodies in the German health care system--a project to promote quality assurance in medicine]. , 1999, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[11]  P. Littlejohns,et al.  Appraising clinical practice guidelines in England and Wales: the development of a methodologic framework and its application to policy. , 1999, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[12]  Alessandro Liberati,et al.  Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  James Grant,et al.  Making use of guidelines in clinical practice. , 2000 .

[14]  J. Renaud-salis,et al.  Methodologie de developpement des standards, options et recommandations diagnostiques et therapeutiques en cancerologie , 1995 .

[15]  A. Haycox,et al.  Clinical guidelines—the hidden costs , 1999, BMJ.

[16]  A. Hillman,et al.  Competing Practice Guidelines: Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis To Make Optimal Decisions , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  National survey of UK clinical guidelines for the management of coronary heart disease, lung and breast cancer, asthma and depression , 1997 .

[18]  T. Peters,et al.  What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines , 1996, BMJ.

[19]  P. Ravaud,et al.  From clinical guidelines to quality assurance: the experience of Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. , 1997, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[20]  M. Serra-Prat,et al.  Metodología de diseño y elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en atención primaria , 1997 .

[21]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. , 1999, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[22]  R. Grol,et al.  Development of guidelines for general practice care. , 1993, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[23]  A. Liberati,et al.  The Impact of Patient Management Guidelines on the Care of Breast, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Patients in Italy , 1991, Medical care.

[24]  K. Lombarts,et al.  Quality management in medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[25]  R. Baker,et al.  Fortnightly Review: Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality , 1995, BMJ.

[26]  R S Hayward,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[27]  D. Atkins,et al.  Evidence-based medicine at the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1998, ACP journal club.

[28]  D. Pencheon,et al.  Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel? , 1998, BMJ.

[29]  M. Mäkelä,et al.  Practice guidelines in Finland: availability and quality. , 1997, Quality in health care : QHC.

[30]  Siep Thomas,et al.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study , 1998, BMJ.