A holistic building life cycle energy analysis model

Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia Current assessments of residential building energy demand focus mainly on their operational aspect, notably in terms of space heating and cooling. The embodied energy of buildings and the transport energy consumption of their occupants are typically overlooked. Recent studies have shown that these two energy demands can represent more than half of the life cycle energy of a building over 50 years. This study presents a holistic method which takes into account energy requirements at the building scale, i.e. the embodied and operational energy of the building and its refurbishment, and at the city scale, i.e. the embodied energy of nearby infrastructures (roads, power lines, etc.) and the transport energy (direct and indirect) of its users. This method has been implemented through the development of a software tool which allows the rapid analysis of the life cycle energy demand of buildings at different scales. A case study, located near Melbourne, Australia, confirms that each of the embodied, operational and transport requirements are nearly equally important. Embodied and transport energy consumption represent on average 63% of the life cycle energy requirements. By integrating these three energy flows, the developed method and software tool provide building designers, planners and decision makers with a powerful means to effectively reduce the overall energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions associated with residential buildings. Conference theme: Buildings and energy Keywords: Life cycle energy analysis – Embodied energy – Operational energy –Transport energy

[1]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[2]  T. Schwanen,et al.  Re-evaluating the Impact of Urban Form on Travel Patterns in Europe and North-America , 2006 .

[3]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Comparing High and Low Residential Density: Life-Cycle Analysis of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2006 .

[4]  G. Alefeld,et al.  Interval analysis: theory and applications , 2000 .

[5]  Peter W. Newton,et al.  Urban form and environmental performance , 2000 .

[6]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainable urban form: The big picture , 2013 .

[7]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[8]  Trine Dyrstad Pettersen,et al.  Variation of energy consumption in dwellings due to climate, building and inhabitants , 1994 .

[9]  R. Crawford Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Total requirements of energy and greenhouse gases for Australian transport , 1999 .

[11]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[12]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment , 2011 .

[13]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[14]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance, and disposal of a residential structure. , 2005 .

[15]  R. Baker Kearfott,et al.  Introduction to Interval Analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Kristel de Myttenaere,et al.  Towards a more holistic approach to reducing the energy demand of dwellings , 2011 .

[17]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[18]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Impact of past and future residential housing development patterns on energy demand and related emissions , 2011 .

[19]  Graham J. Treloar,et al.  Comprehensive embodied energy analysis framework , 1998 .

[20]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA , 2004 .