International round‐robin study on the Ames fluctuation test

An international round‐robin study on the Ames fluctuation test [ISO 11350, 2012], a microplate version of the classic plate‐incorporation method for the detection of mutagenicity in water, wastewater and chemicals was performed by 18 laboratories from seven countries. Such a round‐robin study is a precondition for both the finalization of the ISO standardization process and a possible regulatory implementation in water legislation. The laboratories tested four water samples (spiked/nonspiked) and two chemical mixtures with and without supplementation of a S9‐mix. Validity criteria (acceptable spontaneous and positive control‐induced mutation counts) were fulfilled by 92–100%, depending on the test conditions. A two‐step method for statistical evaluation of the test results is proposed and assessed in terms of specificity and sensitivity. The data were first subjected to powerful analysis of variance (ANOVA) after an arcsine‐square‐root transformation to detect significant differences between the test samples and the negative control (NC). A threshold (TH) value based on a pooled NC was then calculated to exclude false positive test results. Statistically, positive effects observed by the William's test were considered negative, if the mean of all replicates of a sample did not exceed the calculated TH. By making use of this approach, the overall test sensitivity was 100%, and the test specificity ranged from 80 to 100%. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  W. Piegorsch,et al.  The Ames test: the two-fold rule revisited. , 1996, Mutation research.

[2]  P. White,et al.  The genotoxic hazards of domestic wastes in surface waters. , 1998, Mutation research.

[3]  G. Reifferscheid,et al.  Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data. , 1996, Mutation research.

[4]  Helga Stopper,et al.  Measurement of genotoxicity in wastewater samples with the in vitro micronucleus test: results of a round-robin study in the context of standardisation according to ISO. , 2008, Mutation research.

[5]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[6]  L. Claxton,et al.  The genotoxicity of industrial wastes and effluents. , 1998, Mutation research.

[7]  L. Claxton,et al.  The genotoxicity of ambient outdoor air, a review: Salmonella mutagenicity. , 2004, Mutation research.

[8]  B. Margolin,et al.  Sources of variability in Ames Salmonella typhimurium tester strains: analysis of the International Collaborative Study on 'genetic drift'. , 1984, Mutation research.

[9]  B. Ames,et al.  An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Statistical evaluation of inter- and intra-laboratory variations of the Ames test, as related to the genetic stability of Salmonella tester strains. , 1984, Mutation research.

[11]  B. Ames,et al.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. , 1983, Mutation research.

[12]  V. Gervais,et al.  Assessment of the performance of the Ames II assay: a collaborative study with 19 coded compounds. , 2004, Mutation research.

[13]  Sebastian Buchinger,et al.  Identification of mutagens in freshwater sediments by the Ames‐fluctuation assay using nitroreductase and acetyltransferase overproducing test strains , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  J Kaldor,et al.  An evaluation of Salmonella (Ames) test data in the published literature: application of statistical procedures and analysis of mutagenic potency. , 1984, Mutation research.

[15]  K. Wakabayashi,et al.  Mutagens in surface waters: a review. , 2004, Mutation research.

[16]  R. Snee,et al.  A procedure for the statistical evaluation of Ames Salmonella assay results. Comparison of results among 4 laboratories. , 1984, Mutation research.

[17]  P. White,et al.  Mutagens in contaminated soil: a review. , 2004, Mutation research.

[18]  K. Urano,et al.  Statistical procedures for estimating the detection limit and determination limit of the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay. , 1998, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Welch Bl.  THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED , 1947 .

[20]  D. A. Williams,et al.  The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. , 1972, Biometrics.

[21]  H. Shinagawa,et al.  Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens. , 1985, Mutation research.

[22]  D. A. Williams,et al.  A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. , 1971, Biometrics.

[23]  Errol Zeiger,et al.  Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity. , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[24]  L. E. Myers,et al.  An interlaboratory study of an EPA/Ames/Salmonella test protocol. , 1987, Mutation research.

[25]  B. Margolin,et al.  Statistical modeling and analyses of a base-specific Salmonella mutagenicity assay. , 2000, Mutation research.

[26]  H. Stopper,et al.  Evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test as an alternative to the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay: position of the GUM Working Group on the in vitro micronucleus test. Gesellschaft für Umwelt-Mutations-forschung. , 1998, Mutation research.

[27]  P. White,et al.  The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review. , 2004, Mutation research.