The Resonating Arm Exerciser: design and pilot testing of a mechanically passive rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance

BackgroundRobotic arm therapy devices that incorporate actuated assistance can enhance arm recovery, motivate patients to practice, and allow therapists to deliver semi-autonomous training. However, because such devices are often complex and actively apply forces, they have not achieved widespread use in rehabilitation clinics or at home. This paper describes the design and pilot testing of a simple, mechanically passive device that provides robot-like assistance for active arm training using the principle of mechanical resonance.MethodsThe Resonating Arm Exerciser (RAE) consists of a lever that attaches to the push rim of a wheelchair, a forearm support, and an elastic band that stores energy. Patients push and pull on the lever to roll the wheelchair back and forth by about 20 cm around a neutral position. We performed two separate pilot studies of the device. In the first, we tested whether the predicted resonant properties of RAE amplified a user’s arm mobility by comparing his or her active range of motion (AROM) in the device achieved during a single, sustained push and pull to the AROM achieved during rocking. In a second pilot study designed to test the therapeutic potential of the device, eight participants with chronic stroke (35 ± 24 months since injury) and a mean, stable, initial upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (FM) score of 17 ± 8 / 66 exercised with RAE for eight 45 minute sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome measure was the average AROM measured with a tilt sensor during a one minute test, and the secondary outcome measures were the FM score and the visual analog scale for arm pain.ResultsIn the first pilot study, we found people with a severe motor impairment after stroke intuitively found the resonant frequency of the chair, and the mechanical resonance of RAE amplified their arm AROM by a factor of about 2. In the second pilot study, AROM increased by 66% ± 20% (p = 0.003). The mean FM score increase was 8.5 ± 4 pts (p = 0.009). Subjects did not report discomfort or an increase in arm pain with rocking. Improvements were sustained at three months.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that a simple mechanical device that snaps onto a manual wheelchair can use resonance to assist arm training, and that such training shows potential for safely increasing arm movement ability for people with severe chronic hemiparetic stroke.

[1]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  Sandra B. Davis,et al.  Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Chronic Stroke: Not Always Efficacious , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[4]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Ruud W Selles,et al.  Feedback-controlled and programmed stretching of the ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors in stroke: effects of a 4-week intervention program. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Hawkins,et al.  Modeling energy expenditure associated with isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle action at the knee , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[9]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  A Functional Threshold for Long-Term Use of Hand and Arm Function Can Be Determined: Predictions From a Computational Model and Supporting Data From the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[12]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Robert Riener,et al.  Hiding robot inertia using resonance , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[14]  P. Feys,et al.  The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  L. Sawaki,et al.  Use-dependent plasticity of the human motor cortex in health and disease , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  S. Shore,et al.  Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. , 2008, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[18]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Millard F. Beatty,et al.  Principles of Engineering Mechanics , 1986 .

[20]  M. Jannink,et al.  Systematic review of the effects of exercise therapy on the upper extremity of patients with spinal-cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[21]  J. Whitall,et al.  Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Improves Motor Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke , 2000, Stroke.

[22]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Human–Robot Synchrony: Flexible Assistance Using Adaptive Oscillators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[26]  L. Ada,et al.  Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. , 2006, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[27]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries [An Overview] , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[28]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Trial , 2004, Stroke.

[29]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  "If I can't do it once, why do it a hundred times?": Connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[30]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.