The use of GIS‐based digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit karst

Cockpit karst landscapes are among the most distinctive landscapes in the world, and have been the focus of long-standing scientific interest. Early researchers used largely descriptive techniques to categorize the terrain, and subsequent work has not attempted to critically re-evaluate descriptions of landscapes using more sophisticated methods. The distinctive surface topography of cockpit karst areas can be characterized in order to compare them with other karst as well as non-karst areas, and to determine geological and/or climatic conditions that are responsible for the observed terrain. Process models of the rate of karst denudation or evolution can only be accurate if the contemporary morphology of the landscape is quantitatively and unambiguously defined. A detailed analysis of cockpit karst terrain is carried out using the latest GIS-based digital morphometric techniques in order to assess the nature of such terrain and provide further information for subsequent modelling, as well as other non-geomorphological applications, such as environmental management and conservation issues. The paper presents the methodology used for the digital analysis of terrain and landforms in the distinctive Cockpit Country area of Jamaica and its environs. The results indicate that cockpit karst may be categorized based on its vertical, horizontal and shape characteristics, as well as by looking at the semivariogram, slope characteristics, and landscape relief scale, which combine measures of vertical and horizontal scales. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. M. Sweeting,et al.  Karst landforms , 1977, Nature.

[2]  Filippo Catani,et al.  Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data , 2001 .

[3]  Alberto Malinverno,et al.  The length‐scaling properties of topography , 1994 .

[4]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  A statistic for testing the elevation characteristics of landscape simulation models , 1994 .

[5]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[6]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Statistical Analysis with ArcView GIS , 2000 .

[7]  D. Milan,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of ground‐survey elevation data to elucidate spatial and temporal river channel change , 2003 .

[8]  A. Howard,et al.  Early development of karst systems: 1. Preferential flow path enlargement under laminar flow , 1994 .

[9]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[10]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[11]  E. O'Loughlin.  Prediction of Surface Saturation Zones in Natural Catchments by Topographic Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[13]  Rafael L. Bras,et al.  The importance of spatially heterogeneous erosivity and the cumulative area distribution within a basin evolution model , 1995 .

[14]  M. Sweeting.  The Karstlands of Jamaica , 1958 .

[15]  Paul E. Gessler,et al.  Soil-Landscape Modelling and Spatial Prediction of Soil Attributes , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Field guide to the geology and geomorphology of the Tertiary limestones of the Central Inlier and Cockpit Country , 2003 .