Augmented Reality for the Study of Human Heart Anatomy

Augmented reality is increasingly applied in medical education mainly because educators can share knowledge through virtual objects. This research describes the development of a web application, which enhances users' medical knowledge with regards to the anatomy of the human heart by means of augmented reality. Evaluation is conducted in two different facets. In the first one, the authors of this paper evaluate the feasibility of a three-dimensional human heart module using one investigator under the supervision of an expert. In the second, evaluation aims at identifying usability issues by means of the cognitive walkthrough method. Three medical students (naive users) are called upon three target tasks in the web application. Task completion is appreciated in the light of the standard set of cognitive walkthrough questions. Augmented reality content miss hits are revealed by means of the first evaluation in an effort to enhance the educational utility of the three-dimensional human heart. Cognitive walkthrough provides further improvement points, which may further enhance usability in the next software release. The current piece of work constitutes the pre-pilot evaluation. Standardized methodologies are utilized in an effort to improve the application before its wider piloting to proper student populations. Such evaluations are considered important in experiential learning methods aiding online education of anatomy courses.

[1]  Panagiotis D Bamidis,et al.  Exploring Design Requirements for Repurposing Dental Virtual Patients From the Web to Second Life: A Focus Group Study , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  H. Noser,et al.  Potentialities and limitations of a database constructing three-dimensional virtual bone models , 2013, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[3]  Rhys Gethin Thomas,et al.  Augmented Reality for Anatomical Education , 2010, Journal of visual communication in medicine.

[4]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide , 1994 .

[5]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  F. Fischer Medical education in Germany. , 1967, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[8]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? , 2007, Medical teacher.

[9]  Nassir Navab,et al.  mirracle: An augmented reality magic mirror system for anatomy education , 2012, 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW).

[10]  C Kourtidou-Papadeli,et al.  An e-learning platform for aerospace medicine. , 2008, Hippokratia.

[11]  W. Monkhouse Terminologia Anatomica. International Anatomical Terminology . By the F EDERATIVE C OMMITTEE ON A NATOMICAL T ERMINOLOGY (FCAT). (Pp. x+292. with CD-Rom; EUR 40.39 hardback; ISBN 3 13 115251 6.) Stuttgart: Georg Thieme. 1998. , 2001 .

[12]  Xiaowei Zhong Mobile collaborative augmented reality: A prototype for industrial training , 2002 .

[13]  Lazaros Ioannidis,et al.  Virtual Patients on the Semantic Web: A Proof-of-Application Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Lei Tang,et al.  Maximizing modern distribution of complex anatomical spatial information: 3D reconstruction and rapid prototype production of anatomical corrosion casts of human specimens , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  Susana Norma Biasutto,et al.  Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers? , 2006, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[16]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[17]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[18]  Saran Shantikumar,et al.  From lecture theatre to portable media: students’ perceptions of an enhanced podcast for revision , 2009, Medical teacher.

[19]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Web‐based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[20]  Ann L. Fruhling,et al.  An Evaluation of the Usability of a Computerized Decision Support System for Nursing Homes , 2011, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[21]  R. J. Cowie,et al.  The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[22]  Ladislav Dušek,et al.  Interactive Algorithms for Teaching and Learning Acute Medicine in the Network of Medical Faculties MEFANET , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Neil Soni,et al.  Gray's anatomy – the anatomical basis of clinical practice, expert consult , 2010 .

[24]  Robin Heyden,et al.  Use of a virtual world computer environment for international distance education: lessons from a pilot project using Second Life , 2014, BMC medical education.

[25]  G. Schmidmaier,et al.  Blended learning approach improves teaching in a problem-based learning environment in orthopedics - a pilot study , 2014, BMC medical education.

[26]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Evaluating Evaluation Methods , 1994, BCS HCI.

[27]  U. von Jan,et al.  mARble – Augmented Reality in Medical Education , 2012 .