Feasibility of uncertainty quantification for power distribution network modeling using PCE and a contour integral method

This work presents the modeling of the printed circuit board part of power distribution networks (PDNs) and example results for the uncertainty quantification for the magnitude of the corresponding impedance. Variability is considered for several parameters, including geometry, material properties, and the models of the decoupling capacitors. For the computation of the parallel plate impedance an efficient and accurate two-dimensional contour integral method (CIM) is applied together with models for the wave number for the complete frequency range of interest. Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is used in the non-intrusive form of stochastic testing for the uncertainty quantification and Monte Carlo simulations are used for the validation of these results. To our knowledge this combination of methods represents the first application of CIM and PCE to the modeling of PDNs. The PCE is found to be numerically more efficient than Monte Carlo in cases where parameters are varied that have an influence on the parallel plate impedance. It can be less efficient for variation of only the models of decoupling capacitors. It is applicable if not too many parameters are varied at a time and accurate if resonance effects due to low-loss substrate materials and components are not too pronounced at the considered frequency.

[1]  Eby G. Friedman,et al.  Power Distribution Networks with On-Chip Decoupling Capacitors , 2007 .

[2]  大越 孝敬 Planar circuits for microwaves and lightwaves , 1985 .

[3]  G. Antonini A Low-Frequency Accurate Cavity Model for Transient Analysis of Power-Ground Structures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[5]  James L. Drewniak,et al.  PDN Design Strategies : I . Ceramic SMT Decoupling Capacitors – What Values Should I Choose ? , 2006 .

[6]  A Ege Engin Efficient Sensitivity Calculations for Optimization of Power Delivery Network Impedance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[7]  Sourajeet Roy,et al.  Multidimensional Variability Analysis of Complex Power Distribution Networks via Scalable Stochastic Collocation Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[8]  James L. Drewniak,et al.  The first is entitled “ PDN Design Strategies : II . Ceramic SMT Decoupling Capacitors – Does Location Matter ? ” , 2006 .

[9]  Ibrahim M. Elfadel,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for integrated circuits: Stochastic spectral methods , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).

[10]  Takanori Okoshi Planar Circuits for Microwaves and Lightwaves , 1985 .

[11]  Madhavan Swaminathan,et al.  Power Integrity Modeling and Design for Semiconductors and Systems , 2007 .

[12]  Christian Schuster,et al.  Impact of continuous time linear equalizer variability on eye opening of high-speed links , 2016, 2016 IEEE 20th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI).

[13]  X. Duan,et al.  Circular Ports in Parallel-Plate Waveguide Analysis With Isotropic Excitations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.